S v Abusema (CRIMINAL 54 of 2008) [2008] NAHC 46 (2 June 2008)

S v Abusema (CRIMINAL 54 of 2008) [2008] NAHC 46 (2 June 2008)

The sentence imposed was lawful because the offence was committed before the commencement of the 2004 amendment, and the 1993 amendment did not require minimum sentences or the recording of 'special and compelling circumstances.'

Citation
[2008] NAHC 46
Parties
Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Saul Abusema
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
2 June 2008
Case Number
CRIMINAL 54 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Review Judgment
Outcome
conviction and sentence confirmed
Legal Topics
Theft, Stock Theft, Sentencing, Statutory Interpretation
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Theft Stock Theft Sentencing Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecutor

Saul Abusema

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Review / Review Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions at the time of the offence
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate erred by not recording 'special and compelling circumstances' for deviating from a prescribed sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was lawful because the offence was committed before the commencement of the 2004 amendment, and the 1993 amendment did not require minimum sentences or the recording of 'special and compelling circumstances.'

Court Disposition

conviction and sentence confirmed