S v Bashala (CC 30 of 2018) [2022] NAHCMD 366 (26 July 2022)
The accused was found guilty on counts 13, 14, and 15 because the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that she facilitated the illegal entry of migrants into Namibia for financial benefit, received payments, and made false promises of relocation, while her defence was a mere denial and not reasonably true.
- Citation
- [2022] NAHCMD 366
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Abigail Bashala
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2022
- Case Number
- CC 30 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Conviction on counts 13, 14, and 15; acquittal on counts 1, 2, and 3.
- Legal Topics
- Migrant Smuggling, Prevention of Organised Crime Act, Illegal Entry, Financial Benefit, Refugee Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecutor
Abigail Bashala
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused aided or abetted the smuggling of migrants into Namibia for financial or material benefit
- 2 Whether the accused received payments for facilitating illegal entry and relocation of migrants
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was found guilty on counts 13, 14, and 15 because the evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that she facilitated the illegal entry of migrants into Namibia for financial benefit, received payments, and made false promises of relocation, while her defence was a mere denial and not reasonably true.
Court Disposition
Conviction on counts 13, 14, and 15; acquittal on counts 1, 2, and 3.
Orders
- The accused is found guilty on offences charged in respect of counts 13, 14 and 15 respectively, and convicted accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment