S v Collin (CRIMINAL 93 of 2011) [2011] NAHC 313 (18 October 2011)
The accused was not a prisoner as defined by the Prisons Act and the police station was not a prison under the Act; thus, the conviction under section 75(e) was improper but the facts support a conviction for escape from lawful custody.
- Citation
- [2011] NAHC 313
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Jakob Collin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2011
- Case Number
- CRIMINAL 93 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review / Judgment on Automatic Review
- Outcome
- Conviction under section 75(e) of the Prisons Act set aside and substituted with conviction for escape from lawful custody; sentence confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Escape From Lawful Custody, Prisons Act, Conviction Substitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecutor
Jakob Collin
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Judgment on Automatic Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was properly convicted under section 75(e) of the Prisons Act
- 2 Whether the facts support a conviction for escape from lawful custody
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was not a prisoner as defined by the Prisons Act and the police station was not a prison under the Act; thus, the conviction under section 75(e) was improper but the facts support a conviction for escape from lawful custody.
Court Disposition
Conviction under section 75(e) of the Prisons Act set aside and substituted with conviction for escape from lawful custody; sentence confirmed.
Orders
- The conviction on the charge of having contravened section 75(e) of the Prisons Act, 17 of 1998 is set aside and substituted with a conviction for escape from lawful custody.
- The sentence is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment