S v Doeseb (2) (CC 123 of 1996) [1996] NAHC 65 (16 October 1996)

S v Doeseb (2) (CC 123 of 1996) [1996] NAHC 65 (16 October 1996)

The court found that the complainant's evidence, immediate report, medical findings of partial penetration and injury, and the accused's own plea and statement to the magistrate, taken together, proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt. The slightest penetration is sufficient for rape, and the absence of semen or sperm is immaterial.

Citation
[1996] NAHC 65
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Dawid Doeseb
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
16 October 1996
Case Number
CC 123 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Full Trial
Outcome
Guilty as charged
Legal Topics
Rape, Sexual Offences, Evidence, Penetration, Corroboration, Child Witness
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Rape Sexual Offences Evidence Penetration Corroboration Child Witness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Dawid Doeseb

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment After Full Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed rape as charged
  2. 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence of penetration
  3. 3 Whether the complainant's evidence was credible and corroborated

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the complainant's evidence, immediate report, medical findings of partial penetration and injury, and the accused's own plea and statement to the magistrate, taken together, proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt. The slightest penetration is sufficient for rape, and the absence of semen or sperm is immaterial.

Court Disposition

Guilty as charged