S v Gochera and Another (CRIMINAL 72 of 2010) [2010] NAHC 174 (29 October 2010)
Section 30 does not criminalize the conduct of permit holders who breach permit conditions; the accused should have been charged under section 29(5), and multiple convictions for the same offence are improper.
- Citation
- [2010] NAHC 174
- Parties
- Prosecutor: State; Accused: Masirba Israel Gochera; Accused: Christopher Kufaruwenga
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2010
- Case Number
- CRIMINAL 72 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review / Judgment on Review
- Outcome
- conviction substituted and partially set aside
- Legal Topics
- Improper Charge Framing, Multiplicity of Convictions, Immigration Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State
Prosecutor
Masirba Israel Gochera
Accused
Christopher Kufaruwenga
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Judgment on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 30(1) of the Immigration Act, 7 of 1993 creates the offence as charged
- 2 Whether accused should have been charged under section 29(5) of Act 7 of 1993
- 3 Whether there was a multiplication of convictions for accused no 2
Ratio Decidendi
Section 30 does not criminalize the conduct of permit holders who breach permit conditions; the accused should have been charged under section 29(5), and multiple convictions for the same offence are improper.
Court Disposition
conviction substituted and partially set aside
Orders
- Conviction of accused no 1 on count 1 under section 30 substituted with conviction under section 29(5) read with section 29(6) of Act 7 of 1993
- Sentence of accused no 1 on count 1 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment