S v Gurisam (CC 118 of 1994) [1994] NAHC 14 (23 November 1994)

S v Gurisam (CC 118 of 1994) [1994] NAHC 14 (23 November 1994)

The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the fatal stab wound and to exclude the possibility that the fatal wound could have been self-inflicted by the deceased during a struggle. The physical evidence supported the accused's version, and the eyewitness testimony was unreliable.

Citation
[1994] NAHC 14
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Stanley Gurisam
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
23 November 1994
Case Number
CC 118 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
Acquittal
Legal Topics
Murder, Self Defence, Burden of Proof, Mens Rea
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Murder Self Defence Burden of Proof Mens Rea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Stanley Gurisam

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased
  2. 2 Whether the fatal wound could have been self-inflicted during a struggle
  3. 3 Whether the State proved its case beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the fatal stab wound and to exclude the possibility that the fatal wound could have been self-inflicted by the deceased during a struggle. The physical evidence supported the accused's version, and the eyewitness testimony was unreliable.

Court Disposition

Acquittal

Orders

  • Accused found not guilty and discharged