S v Kashala (CC 5 of 2005) [2005] NAHC 40 (26 October 2005)
The court found that the accused's version was not reasonably possibly true, that the confession was admissible and corroborated by other evidence, and that the accused intentionally killed the deceased by stabbing her 35 times. The accused's lies and lack of explanation for the locked room further supported the State's case. The court was satisfied that the State proved murder beyond reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- [2005] NAHC 40
- Parties
- Prosecution: The State; Accused: Immanuel Kashala
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2005
- Case Number
- CC 5 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment and Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence upheld
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Confession, Sentencing, Evidence, Violence Against Women
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecution
Immanuel Kashala
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased
- 2 Admissibility and effect of confession
- 3 Credibility of witnesses and accused's version
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused's version was not reasonably possibly true, that the confession was admissible and corroborated by other evidence, and that the accused intentionally killed the deceased by stabbing her 35 times. The accused's lies and lack of explanation for the locked room further supported the State's case. The court was satisfied that the State proved murder beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence upheld
Orders
- Accused convicted of murder
- Accused sentenced to 21 years imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment