S v Mateus (CC 23 of 2010) [2011] NAHC 70 (14 March 2011)
The seriousness of the offence, the age of the victim, the breach of trust, and the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors. The prescribed minimum sentence is justified and exceeded due to the gravity of the crime, with a portion suspended to allow for rehabilitation.
- Citation
- [2011] NAHC 70
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Petrus Mateus
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2011
- Case Number
- CC 23 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Minimum Sentences, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, Delay in Prosecution, Remorse
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecutor
Petrus Mateus
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of rape of a one-year-old child under the Combating of Rape Act, 2000?
- 2 Are there substantial and compelling circumstances to depart from the prescribed minimum sentence?
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offence, the age of the victim, the breach of trust, and the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors. The prescribed minimum sentence is justified and exceeded due to the gravity of the crime, with a portion suspended to allow for rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Accused sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment, of which three (3) years are suspended for five (5) years on condition that the accused is not convicted of rape or attempted rape during the period of suspension.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment