S v Mateus (CC 23 of 2010) [2011] NAHC 70 (14 March 2011)

S v Mateus (CC 23 of 2010) [2011] NAHC 70 (14 March 2011)

The seriousness of the offence, the age of the victim, the breach of trust, and the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors. The prescribed minimum sentence is justified and exceeded due to the gravity of the crime, with a portion suspended to allow for rehabilitation.

Citation
[2011] NAHC 70
Parties
Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Petrus Mateus
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
14 March 2011
Case Number
CC 23 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Rape, Sentencing, Minimum Sentences, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, Delay in Prosecution, Remorse
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecutor

Petrus Mateus

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of rape of a one-year-old child under the Combating of Rape Act, 2000?
  2. 2 Are there substantial and compelling circumstances to depart from the prescribed minimum sentence?

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of the offence, the age of the victim, the breach of trust, and the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors. The prescribed minimum sentence is justified and exceeded due to the gravity of the crime, with a portion suspended to allow for rehabilitation.

Court Disposition

Convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Accused sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment, of which three (3) years are suspended for five (5) years on condition that the accused is not convicted of rape or attempted rape during the period of suspension.