S v Navi (2) (CRIMINAL 121 of 2007) [2007] NAHC 137 (10 October 2007)
The conviction of accused no 2 was not in order because his answer to the court's question was ambiguous and possibly raised a defence, requiring further clarification before conviction could be confirmed.
- Citation
- [2007] NAHC 137
- Parties
- Prosecution: The State; Accused: Iipinge Vetta Navi; Accused: Shigwedha Mika Shivute
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2007
- Case Number
- CRIMINAL 121 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review / Review Judgment
- Outcome
- partly confirmed, partly set aside and remitted
- Legal Topics
- Housebreaking, Theft, Plea Procedure, Conviction Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecution
Iipinge Vetta Navi
Accused
Shigwedha Mika Shivute
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Review Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty by accused no 2 was unequivocal and sufficient for conviction under section 112(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977
- 2 Whether joint questioning of co-accused is permissible or desirable
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction of accused no 2 was not in order because his answer to the court's question was ambiguous and possibly raised a defence, requiring further clarification before conviction could be confirmed.
Court Disposition
partly confirmed, partly set aside and remitted
Orders
- The conviction and sentence of accused no 1 are confirmed.
- The conviction and sentence of accused no 2 are set aside and the matter is remitted to the magistrate in terms of section 312(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977, for compliance with section 112(1)(b) or section 113.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment