S v Ndikwetepo and Others (1) (CC 61 of 1992) [1992] NAHC 2 (6 July 1992)

S v Ndikwetepo and Others (1) (CC 61 of 1992) [1992] NAHC 2 (6 July 1992)

The court found, based on corroborated police records, officer and interpreter testimony, and the absence of credible evidence of threats or undue influence, that the statements/confessions by accused nos. 3, 4, and 7 were made freely and voluntarily. The objections raised by the accused were not supported by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] NAHC 2
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Paulus Ndikwetepo; Accused: Primus Angula; Accused: Matheus Tjapa; Accused: Mwoomanghi Halemhote; Accused: Michael Angula; Accused: Venasius Ameho; Accused: Martin Kadwika
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Case Number
CC 61 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Statements/confessions (trial Within a Trial)
Outcome
Statements/confessions by accused nos. 3, 4, and 7 admitted as evidence.
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Confessions, Voluntariness of Statements, Trial Within a Trial, Police Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Admissibility of Confessions Voluntariness of Statements Trial Within a Trial Police Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Paulus Ndikwetepo

Accused

Primus Angula

Accused

Matheus Tjapa

Accused

Mwoomanghi Halemhote

Accused

Michael Angula

Accused

Venasius Ameho

Accused

Martin Kadwika

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Statements/confessions (trial Within a Trial)

  1. 1 Whether the statements/confessions by accused nos. 3, 4, and 7 were made freely and voluntarily without undue influence or threats and are thus admissible as evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, based on corroborated police records, officer and interpreter testimony, and the absence of credible evidence of threats or undue influence, that the statements/confessions by accused nos. 3, 4, and 7 were made freely and voluntarily. The objections raised by the accused were not supported by the evidence or the occurrence book records. Therefore, the statements are admissible as evidence.

Court Disposition

Statements/confessions by accused nos. 3, 4, and 7 admitted as evidence.

Orders

  • Statement of accused no. 4 admitted without objection.
  • Confession of accused no. 3 (Exhibit ii) admitted as evidence.