S v Patrick (CR 58 of 2022) [2022] NAHCMD 342 (1 July 2022)
The evidence did not establish that the accused had the intention to kill the complainant; rather, he intended to injure her. Therefore, the conviction for attempted murder was not justified and should be substituted with assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
- Citation
- [2022] NAHCMD 342
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Ndemena Patrick
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 2022
- Case Number
- CR 58 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Review Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence set aside; substituted conviction; remitted for fresh sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Review Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecutor
Ndemena Patrick
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Review Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for attempted murder was justified based on the evidence
- 2 Whether the accused had the intention to kill or only to cause grievous bodily harm
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that the accused had the intention to kill the complainant; rather, he intended to injure her. Therefore, the conviction for attempted murder was not justified and should be substituted with assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence set aside; substituted conviction; remitted for fresh sentencing
Orders
- The conviction and sentence are set aside
- The accused is convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment