S v Rickerts (CC 8 of 2015) [2016] NAHCMD 30 (25 February 2016)

S v Rickerts (CC 8 of 2015) [2016] NAHCMD 30 (25 February 2016)

The accused failed to establish a reasonable doubt that he lacked criminal capacity due to intoxication; eyewitness evidence established he acted with direct intent and was not so intoxicated as to negate criminal responsibility. The State proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased. The evidence was insufficient to prove the charge of defeating or obstructing the course of justice.

Citation
[2016] NAHCMD 30
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Bryan Rickerts
Court
High Court Main Division
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
25 February 2016
Case Number
CC 8 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Count 1: Guilty of murder (dolus directus); Count 2: Not guilty of defeating or obstructing or attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.
Legal Topics
Murder, Intoxication, Criminal Capacity, Defeating or Obstructing the Course of Justice
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Murder Intoxication Criminal Capacity Defeating or Obstructing the Course of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Bryan Rickerts

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused lacked criminal capacity due to intoxication at the time of the offence
  2. 2 Whether the accused is guilty of murder (dolus directus)
  3. 3 Whether the accused is guilty of defeating or obstructing the course of justice

Ratio Decidendi

The accused failed to establish a reasonable doubt that he lacked criminal capacity due to intoxication; eyewitness evidence established he acted with direct intent and was not so intoxicated as to negate criminal responsibility. The State proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased. The evidence was insufficient to prove the charge of defeating or obstructing the course of justice.

Court Disposition

Count 1: Guilty of murder (dolus directus); Count 2: Not guilty of defeating or obstructing or attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.