S v Shilongo (4) (CC 4 of 2015) [2016] NAHCMD 127 (25 April 2016)

S v Shilongo (4) (CC 4 of 2015) [2016] NAHCMD 127 (25 April 2016)

The seriousness and brutality of the murder, committed in a domestic context against a vulnerable victim, outweigh the accused’s personal circumstances, necessitating a severe sentence to reflect society’s intolerance for domestic violence and to serve the objectives of punishment, prevention, and retribution.

Citation
[2016] NAHCMD 127
Parties
Prosecution: The State; Accused: Paulus Shilongo
Court
High Court Main Division
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
25 April 2016
Case Number
CC 4 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Murder, Domestic Violence, Sentencing, Dolus Eventualis
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Prosecution

Paulus Shilongo

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for murder in the form of dolus eventualis committed in a domestic violence context?
  2. 2 Should domestic violence be treated as an aggravating factor in sentencing?

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness and brutality of the murder, committed in a domestic context against a vulnerable victim, outweigh the accused’s personal circumstances, necessitating a severe sentence to reflect society’s intolerance for domestic violence and to serve the objectives of punishment, prevention, and retribution.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 30 years imprisonment, of which 2 years are suspended for 5 years on condition that the accused is not convicted of murder or any offence involving violence against another person during the period of suspension.