S v Shokongo (1) (CRIMINAL 51 of 2011) [2011] NAHC 170 (17 June 2011)
Theft of N$900.00 is not a minor offence and the magistrate erred in applying section 112(1)(a) without questioning the accused under section 112(1)(b); conviction and sentence are set aside and the matter is referred back for proper procedure.
- Citation
- [2011] NAHC 170
- Parties
- Prosecution: The State; Accused: Eliaser Shikongo
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2011
- Case Number
- CRIMINAL 51 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Review Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence set aside; matter referred back to magistrate
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Malicious Damage to Property, Plea Procedure, Section 112(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Act, Section 112(1)(b) Criminal Procedure Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecution
Eliaser Shikongo
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Review Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate erred in applying section 112(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act to a theft of N$900.00
- 2 Whether the accused should have been questioned under section 112(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Ratio Decidendi
Theft of N$900.00 is not a minor offence and the magistrate erred in applying section 112(1)(a) without questioning the accused under section 112(1)(b); conviction and sentence are set aside and the matter is referred back for proper procedure.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence set aside; matter referred back to magistrate
Orders
- The conviction and sentence of the accused are set aside.
- The matter is referred back to the magistrate to apply section 112(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act in respect of the accused’s plea of guilty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment