S v Drayer and Another (1 of 1990) [1990] NASC 4 (12 November 1990)
The appellants' statements, including their insistence on an intention to pay and lack of intent to defraud, created doubt as to whether they made unequivocal admissions of guilt. The Magistrate should have altered the plea to not guilty under Section 113, and the order for retrial was correct.
- Citation
- [1990] NASC 4
- Parties
- First Appellant: Werner Drayer; Second Appellant: Dawid Benjamin Majiedt; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1990
- Case Number
- 1 of 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment From Order Setting Aside Conviction and Sentence, Remitting for Retrial
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Plea Procedure, Mens Rea, Section 112(2) Criminal Procedure Act, Section 113 Criminal Procedure Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Werner Drayer
First Appellant
Dawid Benjamin Majiedt
Second Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Judgment From Order Setting Aside Conviction and Sentence, Remitting for Retrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants made an unequivocal admission of guilt under Section 112(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act
- 2 Whether the Magistrate erred by not altering the plea to not guilty under Section 113
- 3 Whether the intention to pay negates the mens rea for fraud
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants' statements, including their insistence on an intention to pay and lack of intent to defraud, created doubt as to whether they made unequivocal admissions of guilt. The Magistrate should have altered the plea to not guilty under Section 113, and the order for retrial was correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment