S v Tjikuzu (1) (CC 48 of 1996) [1996] NAHC 12 (19 June 1996)
The accused's explanations for the shooting were found to be false and inconsistent with the medical and police evidence. The court concluded that the accused shot the deceased in the back at close range, and that by firing the pistol under such circumstances, the accused must have appreciated the real likelihood of causing death or serious injury, thus acting with constructive intent (dolus eventualis).
- Citation
- [1996] NAHC 12
- Parties
- Prosecution: The State; Accused: Andreas Tjikuzu
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 1996
- Case Number
- CC 48 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Guilty of murder with constructive intent (dolus eventualis)
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Dolus Eventualis, Constructive Intent, Firearm Offences, Evidentiary Inference
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecution
Andreas Tjikuzu
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased
- 2 Whether the accused's explanation for the shooting was credible
- 3 Whether the accused acted with constructive intent (dolus eventualis)
Ratio Decidendi
The accused's explanations for the shooting were found to be false and inconsistent with the medical and police evidence. The court concluded that the accused shot the deceased in the back at close range, and that by firing the pistol under such circumstances, the accused must have appreciated the real likelihood of causing death or serious injury, thus acting with constructive intent (dolus eventualis).
Court Disposition
Guilty of murder with constructive intent (dolus eventualis)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment