S v Wakunuma (CRIMINAL 54 of 2010) [2010] NAHC 142 (28 September 2010)
The suspended sentence was incorrectly formulated by referencing the wrong statutory provision and using the term 'property' instead of 'goods'; the sentence was substituted to correctly reference section 14(1)(a) and the proper terminology.
- Citation
- [2010] NAHC 142
- Parties
- Prosecution: State; Accused: Wakunuma Wakunuma
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2010
- Case Number
- CRIMINAL 54 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review / Review Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction confirmed; sentence substituted
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Declare Goods, Suspended Sentence, Formulation of Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State
Prosecution
Wakunuma Wakunuma
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review / Review Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the formulation of the suspended sentence was correct under section 14(1)(a) of the Customs and Excise Act, 20 of 1998.
Ratio Decidendi
The suspended sentence was incorrectly formulated by referencing the wrong statutory provision and using the term 'property' instead of 'goods'; the sentence was substituted to correctly reference section 14(1)(a) and the proper terminology.
Court Disposition
conviction confirmed; sentence substituted
Orders
- The conviction is confirmed.
- The sentence is substituted with: N$1000 or 1 year imprisonment of which N$500 or 6 months is suspended for 4 years on condition that the accused is not found guilty of not declaring goods in contravention of section 14(1)(a) of the Customs and Excise Act, 20 of 1998, committed during the period of suspension.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment