S v Ganeb (1) (CA 85 of 1998) [1999] NAHC 19 (29 November 1999)
- Citation
- [1999] NAHC 19
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal/appeal Struck From Roll
- Case number
- CA 85 of 1998
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal/appeal Struck From Roll
- Case number
- CA 85 of 1998
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal was not properly before the court as the appellant did not obtain the required judges' certificate and there were no prospects of success on appeal.
Court disposition
appeal struck from the roll
02
Material facts
Parties
Simon Ganeb
AppellantThe State
Respondent Counsel: Ms WellmanAmounts and remedies
- Sentence (suspended Imprisonment): months 12
- Suspension Period: years 5
- Sentence (imprisonment): years 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal/appeal Struck From Roll
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellant could prosecute an appeal without a judges' certificate under sections 305 and 309(4)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act
- 02
Whether the appeal was properly before the court
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant, in person, sought to appeal both conviction and sentence, requested leave to appeal and condonation, and asked for the case record.
- Respondent
- The respondent, represented by Ms Wellman, opposed the appeal, and the judges found no prospects of success on appeal against conviction or sentence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, sections 305 and 309(4)(a)
A prisoner may not prosecute an appeal without a judges' certificate under sections 305 and 309(4)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal was not properly before the court as the appellant did not obtain the required judges' certificate and there were no prospects of success on appeal.
Court disposition
appeal struck from the roll
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
SIMON G A N EB V T HE STATE
CRIMINAL P R O C E D U RE C A SE N O. CA 8 5 / 1 9 98 1 9 9 9 / 1 1 / 29 G i b s o n, J. et M a r i t z, J. S e c t i o ns 3 05 a nd 309(4)(a) of CPA - P r i s o n er in m ay n ot p r o s e c u te a p e r s on - c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i ty of s e c t i o ns n e i t h er r a i s ed n ot a t t a c k ed - a p p e al s t r u ck from t he roll. r e v i ew or a p p e al c e r t i f i c a te w i t h o ut j u d g e s'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA CASE NO. CA 85/98 In the matter between:
SIMON GANEB
APPELLANT versus
THE STATE
RESPONDENT CORAM: GIBSON, J. et MARITZ, J. Heard on: 1999.11.29 Delivered on: 1999.11.29 {ex tempore) JUDGMENT: MARITZ. J.: After having been convicted in the magistrate's court, Karibib of the crimes of defeating or obstructing the course of justice and of theft involving stock, the appellant was sentenced on the 3rd of October 1997 to twelve (12) months imprisonment wholly suspended for five (5) years on certain conditions and to three (3) years imprisonment respectively. On 22 June 1998, more than 8 months after the date of his sentence, the appellant i wrote a letter to the Registrar of the High Court in which he purported to file an "appeal" against both his conviction and sentence. On 13 July 1998 he was advised by the Registrar to submit an application for leave to appeal and for condonation to the Magistrates' Court in Karibib. On the 3 1st of July 1998 the appellant wrote a letter to the Magistrates' Court applying for leave to appeal or for the case against him to be re-opened. He also requested a copy of the case record in that letter. A copy of the case record was also requested by his attorneys, Messrs A Davids and Co. on 3 August 1998. That request notwithstanding, his attorney did not file any notice of appeal in terms of Section 309 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. On 21 October 1998 the appellant addressed a further letter to "the Registrar of the High
Court and of the Supreme Court" in which he dealt with the evidence adduced against him. His application for leave to appeal, all the correspondence and the record of proceedings were thereafter submitted to two judges of this court for a certificate to prosecute the intended appeal. That certificate was refused on 26 October 1998 for the following reasons (and I quote): "There are absolutely no prospects of success on appeal either against conviction or against sentence." Shortly afterwards, the Registrar informed the appellant that his application had been declined. Since then the appellant has written numerous letters to the Judge President, the Attorney-General, the Registrar of the High Court and even to the Chief Justice, the contents whereof I do not need to deal with.
ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT
IN PERSON
ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT
MS WELLMAN Instructed by: Prosecutor - General
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.