Namibia Judgment

High Court

S v Ganeb (1) (CA 85 of 1998) [1999] NAHC 19 (29 November 1999)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appeal was not properly before the court as the appellant did not obtain the required judges' certificate and there were no prospects of success on appeal.

Court disposition

appeal struck from the roll

02

Material facts

Parties

Simon Ganeb

Appellant

The State

Respondent Counsel: Ms Wellman

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence (suspended Imprisonment): months 12
  • Suspension Period: years 5
  • Sentence (imprisonment): years 3

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal/appeal Struck From Roll

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant, in person, sought to appeal both conviction and sentence, requested leave to appeal and condonation, and asked for the case record.
Respondent
The respondent, represented by Ms Wellman, opposed the appeal, and the judges found no prospects of success on appeal against conviction or sentence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, sections 305 and 309(4)(a)

    A prisoner may not prosecute an appeal without a judges' certificate under sections 305 and 309(4)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appeal was not properly before the court as the appellant did not obtain the required judges' certificate and there were no prospects of success on appeal.

Court disposition

appeal struck from the roll

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[1999] NAHC 19

SIMON G A N EB V T HE STATE

CRIMINAL P R O C E D U RE C A SE N O. CA 8 5 / 1 9 98 1 9 9 9 / 1 1 / 29 G i b s o n, J. et M a r i t z, J. S e c t i o ns 3 05 a nd 309(4)(a) of CPA - P r i s o n er in m ay n ot p r o s e c u te a p e r s on - c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i ty of s e c t i o ns n e i t h er r a i s ed n ot a t t a c k ed - a p p e al s t r u ck from t he roll. r e v i ew or a p p e al c e r t i f i c a te w i t h o ut j u d g e s'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA CASE NO. CA 85/98 In the matter between:

SIMON GANEB

APPELLANT versus

THE STATE

RESPONDENT CORAM: GIBSON, J. et MARITZ, J. Heard on: 1999.11.29 Delivered on: 1999.11.29 {ex tempore) JUDGMENT: MARITZ. J.: After having been convicted in the magistrate's court, Karibib of the crimes of defeating or obstructing the course of justice and of theft involving stock, the appellant was sentenced on the 3rd of October 1997 to twelve (12) months imprisonment wholly suspended for five (5) years on certain conditions and to three (3) years imprisonment respectively. On 22 June 1998, more than 8 months after the date of his sentence, the appellant i wrote a letter to the Registrar of the High Court in which he purported to file an "appeal" against both his conviction and sentence. On 13 July 1998 he was advised by the Registrar to submit an application for leave to appeal and for condonation to the Magistrates' Court in Karibib. On the 3 1st of July 1998 the appellant wrote a letter to the Magistrates' Court applying for leave to appeal or for the case against him to be re-opened. He also requested a copy of the case record in that letter. A copy of the case record was also requested by his attorneys, Messrs A Davids and Co. on 3 August 1998. That request notwithstanding, his attorney did not file any notice of appeal in terms of Section 309 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. On 21 October 1998 the appellant addressed a further letter to "the Registrar of the High

Court and of the Supreme Court" in which he dealt with the evidence adduced against him. His application for leave to appeal, all the correspondence and the record of proceedings were thereafter submitted to two judges of this court for a certificate to prosecute the intended appeal. That certificate was refused on 26 October 1998 for the following reasons (and I quote): "There are absolutely no prospects of success on appeal either against conviction or against sentence." Shortly afterwards, the Registrar informed the appellant that his application had been declined. Since then the appellant has written numerous letters to the Judge President, the Attorney-General, the Registrar of the High Court and even to the Chief Justice, the contents whereof I do not need to deal with.

ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT

IN PERSON

ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT

MS WELLMAN Instructed by: Prosecutor - General

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, sections 305 and 309(4)(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.