Standard Bank Namibia v Mouton (4 of 2011) [2011] NALC 21 (29 July 2011)
The referral to the Labour Commissioner was made after the statutory 6-month period and was therefore prescribed. The Labour Commissioner had no jurisdiction to make the award, rendering the award and subsequent ruling ultra vires and void.
- Citation
- [2011] NALC 21
- Parties
- Appellant: Standard Bank Namibia; Respondent: Romeo Mouton
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2011
- Case Number
- 4 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Arbitrator's Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal, Jurisdiction, Prescription, Rescission of Award
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Bank Namibia
Appellant
Romeo Mouton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Arbitrator's Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the referral to the Labour Commissioner was out of time and prescribed under Section 86(2) of the Labour Act 11 of 2007
- 2 Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to make the award
- 3 Whether the rescission application was properly dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The referral to the Labour Commissioner was made after the statutory 6-month period and was therefore prescribed. The Labour Commissioner had no jurisdiction to make the award, rendering the award and subsequent ruling ultra vires and void.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The ruling of the arbitrator dated 20th December 2010 is set aside.
- The award dated 28th September 2010 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment