State v Gawanab (CC 31 of 2019) [2021] NAHCMD 176 (21 April 2021)
The court held that ordering the accused to submit to photographs of his bodily features under s 37(3)(a) is lawful, does not infringe his constitutional rights, and is a reasonable and necessary step in the interests of justice. The process does not amount to compelling self-incriminating evidence.
- Citation
- [2021] NAHCMD 176
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The State; Accused: Gavin Gawanab
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2021
- Case Number
- CC 31 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Bodily Features Evidence, Self Incrimination, Fair Trial Rights, Identification Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The State
Prosecutor
Gavin Gawanab
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused can be compelled to submit to photographs of bodily features under s 37(3)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
- 2 Whether such compulsion infringes the accused's constitutional rights to dignity, bodily integrity, and the right against self-incrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that ordering the accused to submit to photographs of his bodily features under s 37(3)(a) is lawful, does not infringe his constitutional rights, and is a reasonable and necessary step in the interests of justice. The process does not amount to compelling self-incriminating evidence.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The investigating officer is ordered to take photographs of the bodily features of the accused before the trial resumes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment