Director General of the Namibia Central Intelligence Service and Another v Haufiku and Others (107 of 2018) [2018] NAHCMD 174 (18 June 2018)
The applicants failed to establish the second requirement for a final interdict, namely that an injury was actually committed or reasonably apprehended. They did not plead or prove factual matter informing the secrecy, sensitivity, or classification of the information, nor did they demonstrate a genuine national security risk. Much of the information was already in the public domain, and the intended publication concerned matters of public interest, including alleged corruption and misuse of public funds. The law cannot be used to cover up potentially unlawful activity. Therefore, the application for an interdict was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2018] NAHCMD 174
- Parties
- Applicant: The Director General of the Namibia Central Intelligence Service; Applicant: The Government of the Republic of Namibia; Respondent: Mathias Haufiku; Respondent: The Editor of The Patriot Newspaper; Respondent: The Patriot Newspaper
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2018
- Case Number
- 107 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional/administrative Law Urgent Application for Interdict / Judgment on Final Interdict
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Freedom of the Press, National Security, Interdicts, Corruption, Public Interest, Access to Information
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Director General of the Namibia Central Intelligence Service
Applicant
The Government of the Republic of Namibia
Applicant
Mathias Haufiku
Respondent
The Editor of The Patriot Newspaper
Respondent
The Patriot Newspaper
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional/administrative Law Urgent Application for Interdict / Judgment on Final Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interdict restraining publication of information relating to the Namibia Central Intelligence Service (NCIS) and its assets on grounds of national security and statutory prohibitions.
- 2 Whether the intended publication by the respondents is protected by the constitutional right to freedom of expression and the media under Article 21(1)(a) of the Namibian Constitution.
- 3 Whether the applicants established the requirements for a final interdict, specifically a clear right and an injury actually committed or reasonably apprehended.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to establish the second requirement for a final interdict, namely that an injury was actually committed or reasonably apprehended. They did not plead or prove factual matter informing the secrecy, sensitivity, or classification of the information, nor did they demonstrate a genuine national security risk. Much of the information was already in the public domain, and the intended publication concerned matters of public interest, including alleged corruption and misuse of public funds. The law cannot be used to cover up potentially unlawful activity. Therefore, the application for an interdict was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of one instructed and one instructing counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment