S v Fillemon (2) (CA 96 of 2007) [2011] NAHC 79 (16 March 2011)

S v Fillemon (2) (CA 96 of 2007) [2011] NAHC 79 (16 March 2011)

The appellant admitted to stabbing the deceased, and the only wound found was the cause of death. The trial magistrate's reliance on the evidence, excluding inadmissible statements by co-accused, was justified. The grounds of appeal were either factually incorrect, vague, or without merit. The conviction for murder was supported by the evidence and proper application of legal principles.

Citation
[2011] NAHC 79
Parties
Appellant: Thomas Fillemon; Respondent: The State
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
16 March 2011
Case Number
CA 96 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure, Dolus Eventualis, Admissibility of Evidence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Fillemon

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for murder was supported by the evidence
  2. 2 Whether the trial magistrate misdirected himself in considering evidence inadmissible against the appellant
  3. 3 Whether the appellant received a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant admitted to stabbing the deceased, and the only wound found was the cause of death. The trial magistrate's reliance on the evidence, excluding inadmissible statements by co-accused, was justified. The grounds of appeal were either factually incorrect, vague, or without merit. The conviction for murder was supported by the evidence and proper application of legal principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed