S v Kau and Others (SA 1 of 1993) [1993] NASC 2 (15 October 1993)
The cumulative effect of the magistrate's failure to inform the appellants of their right to legal representation, to explain the presumption in section 85(2), and to adequately explain other procedural rights constituted fatal irregularities resulting in a failure of justice and an unfair trial. The convictions and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1993] NASC 2
- Parties
- Appellant: Tobias Kau; Appellant: Aiel Xao Kgao; Appellant: Kleinbooi Stiche; Appellant: NC Emsje Xosje; Appellant: Kgao Tsascje; Appellant: N#amshe; Appellant: Xosje Nemsje; Appellant: N#an#i Cwi; Appellant: Xgao Cwi; Appellant: Cwi T#it#e; Appellant: Asser N#ao; Appellant: Moses TseMKXao Gao; Appellant: Cwi Xau; Appellant: Xgau CiuAE; Appellant: Cwi N#ouda; Appellant: Xao Ciqae; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 1993
- Case Number
- SA 1 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Right to Legal Representation, Admissibility of Admissions, Presumption of Authority, Irregularities in Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tobias Kau
Appellant
Aiel Xao Kgao
Appellant
Kleinbooi Stiche
Appellant
NC Emsje Xosje
Appellant
Kgao Tsascje
Appellant
N#amshe
Appellant
Xosje Nemsje
Appellant
N#an#i Cwi
Appellant
Xgao Cwi
Appellant
Cwi T#it#e
Appellant
Asser N#ao
Appellant
Moses TseMKXao Gao
Appellant
Cwi Xau
Appellant
Xgau CiuAE
Appellant
Cwi N#ouda
Appellant
Xao Ciqae
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the failure to inform unrepresented accused of their right to legal representation vitiated the trial
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate's failure to explain the presumption in section 85(2) of the Nature Conservation Ordinance 4 of 1975 constituted a fatal irregularity
- 3 Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions
Ratio Decidendi
The cumulative effect of the magistrate's failure to inform the appellants of their right to legal representation, to explain the presumption in section 85(2), and to adequately explain other procedural rights constituted fatal irregularities resulting in a failure of justice and an unfair trial. The convictions and sentences could not stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Convictions and sentences set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment