Curated case-law topic
Company formation, governance, directors, ownership, filings, and corporate obligations. This curated Namibia collection links existing source-backed legal records for that research intent.
Showing 12 useful cases from 14 matching records.
10 Nov 2022
High Court dismissed summary judgment because disputed facts and counterclaims made the claims unsuitable for determination on the papers.
28 Oct 2022
Appeal dismissed. Court granted condonation for late rule 11(10) report, then upheld cessation of membership in close corporation under s 36.
20 Aug 2021
High Court of Namibia upheld non-joinder of the Prosecutor-General and Tunacor in a dispute linked to the MFV Heinaste and related agreements.
30 Jul 2021
Urgent application dismissed where a shareholder tried to compel others to sell shares on instalment terms under section 260 of the Companies Act.
22 Apr 2021
High Court of Namibia referred a disputed Companies Act s 260 application to trial, emphasising judicial case management and the Konrad v Ndapanda approach.
16 Feb 2021
Exception upheld where pleadings on an alleged unincorporated association conflicted with annexures showing an incorporated company.
3 Dec 2018
Urgent application dismissed: no prima facie case for director-registration relief or alleged interference with a shipwreck salvage project and visa applications.
4 Dec 2017
High Court confirms final winding-up of SME Bank, finding continuing insolvency and substantial compliance with the statutory winding-up requirements.
11 Jul 2017
Provisional winding-up granted against SME Bank after the High Court found factual and commercial insolvency and held that winding-up was just and equitable.
28 Mar 2014
Appeal allowed: the Supreme Court of Namibia held that res judicata did not bar a later damages claim concerning an Exclusive Prospecting Licence.
13 Aug 2012
Appeal reinstated and matter referred to oral evidence on shareholder consent, estoppel, and the validity of a company asset sale under section 228.
14 May 2001
Close corporation action under section 50 had to be brought by a member on behalf of the corporation, not in the corporation’s own name.