Khariseb v Ministry of Safety and Security (1) [2020] NASC 27 (1 July 2020)
The majority held that, given the lack of clarity and reliability in the only direct evidence of an admission, the inconclusive forensic evidence, and the reasonable possibility that the deceased committed suicide, the State failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction and sentence could not stand.
- Citation
- [2020] NASC 27
- Parties
- Appellant: Willem Visagie Barnard; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 2020 1 July 2020 7 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (majority); conviction and sentence set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Burden of Proof, Admissions, Suicide as Defence, Intoxication, Domestic Violence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Willem Visagie Barnard
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a reasonable possibility that the deceased committed suicide
- 2 Whether the State proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt
- 3 Admissibility and reliability of admissions made under intoxication
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that, given the lack of clarity and reliability in the only direct evidence of an admission, the inconclusive forensic evidence, and the reasonable possibility that the deceased committed suicide, the State failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction and sentence could not stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (majority); conviction and sentence set aside.
Orders
- Appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment