Zone Four Electrical Contractors CC v Kunene Regional Council and Others (2972 of 2017) [2018] NAHCMD 111 (26 April 2018)

Zone Four Electrical Contractors CC v Kunene Regional Council and Others (2972 of 2017) [2018] NAHCMD 111 (26 April 2018)

The defendant's opposition was purely technical and did not address the merits or raise a bona fide defence. The final payment certificate constituted an acknowledgment of debt, and the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for the certified amount.

Citation
[2018] NAHCMD 111
Parties
Plaintiff: Zone Four Electrical Contractors CC; First Defendant: The Kunene Regional Council; Second Defendant: Chairperson of the Regional Tender Board for the Kunene Regional Council; Third Defendant: The Minister of Regional and Local Government, Housing and Rural Development; Fourth Defendant: The Government of the Republic of Namibia; Fifth Defendant: WML Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd
Court
High Court Main Division
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
26 April 2018
Case Number
2972 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract) / Summary Judgment Application Ruling
Outcome
Summary judgment granted against the First Defendant.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Acknowledgment of Debt, Construction Contracts, Technical Defences, Payment Certificates
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zone Four Electrical Contractors CC

Plaintiff

The Kunene Regional Council

First Defendant

Chairperson of the Regional Tender Board for the Kunene Regional Council

Second Defendant

The Minister of Regional and Local Government, Housing and Rural Development

Third Defendant

The Government of the Republic of Namibia

Fourth Defendant

WML Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (contract) / Summary Judgment Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for the amount certified in the final payment certificate.
  2. 2 Whether non-compliance with Rule 45(7) (failure to attach written contract) is a valid defence to the claim.
  3. 3 Whether the final payment certificate constitutes an acknowledgment of debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's opposition was purely technical and did not address the merits or raise a bona fide defence. The final payment certificate constituted an acknowledgment of debt, and the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for the certified amount.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted against the First Defendant.

Orders

  • Payment in the amount of NAD 286,867.19
  • Interest on the aforesaid amount at the rate of 20% per annum a tempore morae from date of judgment to date of final payment