INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PTY LIMITED AND ANOR V PRIMARY DISTRIBUTORS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED AND ORS HC AK CIV-2006-404-4695
Because entitlement to an account of profits had already been established and the account hearing requires full evidence and oral testimony, the court refused a separate preliminary hearing as disproportionate and potentially wasteful; further discovery from plaintiffs was declined as marginally relevant and disproportionate given the modest sums at issue; defendants were ordered to provide specified discovery and file detailed briefs and submissions on a set timetable and all substantive issues will be determined at the single account of profits hearing.
- Citation
- openlaw-fd27455a_5961_42a3_8557_c3ec9354eb0a.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Limited; Second Plaintiff: Hefty NZ Limited; First Defendant: Primary Distributors New Zealand Limited; Second Defendant: Donald Johnstone Graham; Third Defendant: Robert John Jones
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Trademark Infringement and Passing Off; Account of Profits / Directions Hearing and Pre‑trial for Account of Profits (hearing Scheduled)
- Outcome
- Application for an additional preliminary hearing refused; plaintiffs' request for further discovery refused; defendants ordered to provide specified discovery and to file briefs and submissions on a fixed timetable; account of profits hearing to proceed as single hearing in May 2010; no order as to costs for this...
- Legal Topics
- Account of Profits, Apportionment, Discovery Scope, Director Liability for Disgorgement, Timetable and Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Limited
First Plaintiff
Hefty NZ Limited
Second Plaintiff
Primary Distributors New Zealand Limited
First Defendant
Donald Johnstone Graham
Second Defendant
Robert John Jones
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trademark Infringement and Passing Off; Account of Profits / Directions Hearing and Pre‑trial for Account of Profits (hearing Scheduled)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an additional preliminary hearing should be held prior to the account of profits hearing
- 2 Whether passing‑off is available and applies to all defendants including directors
- 3 Whether apportionment of profits is required or whether whole profits are attributable to the tort
Ratio Decidendi
Because entitlement to an account of profits had already been established and the account hearing requires full evidence and oral testimony, the court refused a separate preliminary hearing as disproportionate and potentially wasteful; further discovery from plaintiffs was declined as marginally relevant and disproportionate given the modest sums at issue; defendants were ordered to provide specified discovery and file detailed briefs and submissions on a set timetable and all substantive issues will be determined at the single account of profits hearing.
Court Disposition
Application for an additional preliminary hearing refused; plaintiffs' request for further discovery refused; defendants ordered to provide specified discovery and to file briefs and submissions on a fixed timetable; account of profits hearing to proceed as single hearing in May 2010; no order as to costs for this...
Orders
- Single account of profits hearing to determine all issues; no separate preliminary hearing ordered
- Account of profits hearing listed for 27 and 28 May 2010 and scheduler to extend to three days if possible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment