GROSVENOR FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP LIMITED v TAPP [2013] NZHC 2105
The jurisdictional requirements of Insolvency Act 2006 s 13 were established (judgment debt, act of bankruptcy, certainty and payable debt) and no sufficiently founded or evidenced cross-claim or other factor was shown to justify the exercise of discretion under s 37 to refuse adjudication; accordingly the Court adjudicated the debtor bankrupt.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 2105
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Grosvenor Financial Services Group Limited; Judgment Debtor: Robert George Tapp
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Adjudication Application / Hearing on Application for Adjudication Order (oral Judgment)
- Outcome
- Adjudicated bankrupt
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Order, Bankruptcy Notice, Act of Bankruptcy, Judicial Discretion Under S 37
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grosvenor Financial Services Group Limited
Judgment Creditor
Robert George Tapp
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Adjudication Application / Hearing on Application for Adjudication Order (oral Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether jurisdictional requirements under Insolvency Act 2006 s 13 and s 36 are satisfied
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under s 37 to refuse adjudication
- 3 Whether alleged cross-claims against receivers/agents justify withholding adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
The jurisdictional requirements of Insolvency Act 2006 s 13 were established (judgment debt, act of bankruptcy, certainty and payable debt) and no sufficiently founded or evidenced cross-claim or other factor was shown to justify the exercise of discretion under s 37 to refuse adjudication; accordingly the Court adjudicated the debtor bankrupt.
Court Disposition
Adjudicated bankrupt
Orders
- Robert George Tapp adjudicated a bankrupt (order made at 10:55am on 19 August 2013)
- Fixture for 18 September 2013 vacated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment