SAVVY VINEYARDS 4334 LTD v WETA ESTATE LTD [2018] NZHC 1771
Court awarded costs now on a 2B basis, certified second counsel, and reduced the plaintiffs' claimed costs by 20% to reflect the additional costs caused by failed causes of action and unsuccessful arguments; allowed a reduced discovery component (30% of claimed), disallowed document inspection and certain witness/expert travel and invoice claims (Grant and Dr Jordan), allowed the interim injunction costs and filing fee, and declined costs on the costs application, resulting in awarded costs of $37,731.60 against the defendants jointly and $4,906 against the first defendant for the injunction application, with disbursements to be fixed by the Registry.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1771
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: SAVVY VINEYARDS 4334 LIMITED; Second Plaintiff: SAVVY VINEYARDS 3552 LIMITED; First Defendant: WETA ESTATE LIMITED; Second Defendant: TIROSH ESTATE LIMITED
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contract Dispute / Costs Assessment After Liability Stage
- Outcome
- Partially for plaintiffs: costs awarded on 2B with reductions and specific disallowances; costs on costs application declined
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Options to Purchase, Grape Supply Agreements, Costs Assessment and Categorisation (2 B), Rectification, Interim Injunction, Expert Witness Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAVVY VINEYARDS 4334 LIMITED
First Plaintiff
SAVVY VINEYARDS 3552 LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
WETA ESTATE LIMITED
First Defendant
TIROSH ESTATE LIMITED
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract Dispute / Costs Assessment After Liability Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to decide costs now or defer until damages hearing
- 2 Appropriate costs categorisation (2B)
- 3 Certification of second counsel
Ratio Decidendi
Court awarded costs now on a 2B basis, certified second counsel, and reduced the plaintiffs' claimed costs by 20% to reflect the additional costs caused by failed causes of action and unsuccessful arguments; allowed a reduced discovery component (30% of claimed), disallowed document inspection and certain witness/expert travel and invoice claims (Grant and Dr Jordan), allowed the interim injunction costs and filing fee, and declined costs on the costs application, resulting in awarded costs of $37,731.60 against the defendants jointly and $4,906 against the first defendant for the injunction application, with disbursements to be fixed by the Registry.
Court Disposition
Partially for plaintiffs: costs awarded on 2B with reductions and specific disallowances; costs on costs application declined
Orders
- Plaintiffs awarded costs of $37,731.60 against the defendants jointly
- Disbursements to be fixed by the Registry (to take account of GST) and are to be paid by the defendants jointly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment