MIKE PERO MORTGAGES LIMITED v MIKE PERO [2017] NZHC 2647
Leave under s165 was granted because MPRE did not intend to bring enforcement itself due to director conflict, enforcement had a high likelihood of recovering a substantial part of the judgment, anticipated enforcement costs were low relative to the judgment, and MP Mortgages' interests were sufficiently aligned with MPRE's to act in the company's best interests; reputational risks did not outweigh the company's interest in recovery.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 2647
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Mike Pero Mortgages Limited; First Defendant/first Respondent: Mike Pero; Second Defendant/second Respondent: MPZ One Limited; Third Defendant/third Respondent: MPRE Limited; Fourth Defendant/fourth Respondent: Mike Pero Real Estate Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Bring Derivative/enforcement Proceedings Under the Companies Act 1993 Following an Interim Judgment / Leave Application Under S165 and Alternative Enforcement Relief Under S174 After Interim Judgment; Final Directions on Costs Reserved
- Outcome
- Leave granted under s165 for Mike Pero Mortgages Ltd to enforce the Court's judgments and orders on behalf of MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd against Mike Pero and MPZ One Ltd; MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd to pay the reasonable costs of the enforcement proceedings
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Proceedings, Enforcement of Judgment, Unfairly Prejudiced Shareholder S174, Directors' Conflicts of Interest, Shareholders' Agreement, Dividend Policy, Companies Act 1993 S165/s166/s174
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mike Pero Mortgages Limited
Plaintiff/applicant
Mike Pero
First Defendant/first Respondent
MPZ One Limited
Second Defendant/second Respondent
MPRE Limited
Third Defendant/third Respondent
Mike Pero Real Estate Limited
Fourth Defendant/fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Bring Derivative/enforcement Proceedings Under the Companies Act 1993 Following an Interim Judgment / Leave Application Under S165 and Alternative Enforcement Relief Under S174 After Interim Judgment; Final Directions on Costs Reserved
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave under s165 should be granted to allow a shareholder to bring enforcement/derivative proceedings in the name of the company
- 2 Whether enforcement orders as part of final relief under s174 could substitute for derivative leave under s165
- 3 Whether enforcement proceedings are in the best interests of the company given reputational and commercial risks
Ratio Decidendi
Leave under s165 was granted because MPRE did not intend to bring enforcement itself due to director conflict, enforcement had a high likelihood of recovering a substantial part of the judgment, anticipated enforcement costs were low relative to the judgment, and MP Mortgages' interests were sufficiently aligned with MPRE's to act in the company's best interests; reputational risks did not outweigh the company's interest in recovery.
Court Disposition
Leave granted under s165 for Mike Pero Mortgages Ltd to enforce the Court's judgments and orders on behalf of MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd against Mike Pero and MPZ One Ltd; MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd to pay the reasonable costs of the enforcement proceedings
Orders
- Mike Pero Mortgages Ltd is granted leave pursuant to s165 Companies Act 1993 to enforce the judgments and orders of this Court in proceeding CIV-2014-404-2193 in the name and on behalf of MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd against Mike Pero and MPZ One Ltd
- MPRE Ltd and Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd are to pay the costs of the enforcement proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment