FOCUS 2000 LIMITED AND ANOR V WALTON LESLIE BEANLAND AND ORS HC AK CIV 2007-404-000598
The court granted an undertaking to preserve the endowment fund pending resolution of the substantive proceedings and held that the sixth and seventh defendants, as trustees, are entitled in the interim to have their legal costs paid from the fund, while the first to third and fifth defendants (claims against them being personal in nature as directors) are not entitled to access the fund for their legal costs at this stage.
- Citation
- openlaw-37e856df_e973_40bb_af9d_fe331cb78526.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Focus 2000 Limited; Second Plaintiff: The Cerebral Palsy Society of New Zealand Incorporated; First Defendant: Walton Leslie Beanland; Second Defendant: Christine Williamson; Third Defendant: Nikki Pye; Fourth Defendant: Anne Murphy; Fifth Defendant: John Thorpe; Sixth Defendant: Sandringham Trustee Service Limited; Seventh Defendant: Coyle Trustee Services Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (high Court) / Interlocutory Hearing for Interim Injunction/undertaking
- Outcome
- Undertaking granted to preserve funds; interim payment of sixth and seventh defendants' legal costs from the endowment fund allowed; access to fund for legal costs by first to third and fifth defendants denied; timetable directions set.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Conversion/knowing Receipt, Trustees' Indemnity for Costs, Mareva/interim Freezing Relief, Disclosure of Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Focus 2000 Limited
First Plaintiff
The Cerebral Palsy Society of New Zealand Incorporated
Second Plaintiff
Walton Leslie Beanland
First Defendant
Christine Williamson
Second Defendant
Nikki Pye
Third Defendant
Anne Murphy
Fourth Defendant
John Thorpe
Fifth Defendant
Sandringham Trustee Service Limited
Sixth Defendant
Coyle Trustee Services Limited
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (high Court) / Interlocutory Hearing for Interim Injunction/undertaking
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the resolution and transfer of $5,000,000 to the Endowment Foundation was effective at law
- 2 Whether the first to fifth defendants breached their duties as directors under the Companies Act 1993
- 3 Whether the sixth and seventh defendants, as trustees, may have their legal costs paid from the trust fund pending resolution
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted an undertaking to preserve the endowment fund pending resolution of the substantive proceedings and held that the sixth and seventh defendants, as trustees, are entitled in the interim to have their legal costs paid from the fund, while the first to third and fifth defendants (claims against them being personal in nature as directors) are not entitled to access the fund for their legal costs at this stage.
Court Disposition
Undertaking granted to preserve funds; interim payment of sixth and seventh defendants' legal costs from the endowment fund allowed; access to fund for legal costs by first to third and fifth defendants denied; timetable directions set.
Orders
- Undertaking: first to third and fifth to seventh defendants to hold the fund and income without disbursement save for payment of legal expenses incurred by sixth and seventh defendants until settlement, judgment or further order
- Order that sixth and seventh defendants' legal costs and expenses of defence be paid in the first instance from the endowment fund, subject to ultimate incidence of costs to be determined at the substantive hearing or by agreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment