A & N CONTRACTORS (2009) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) v LEVIN AND MADSEN-RIES AS LIQUIDATORS OF A & N CONTRACTORS (2009) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2015] NZHC 3091
The court found the payments were personal drawings on a joint shareholder current account repayable on demand amounting to $294,231.68; the company was insolvent from at least 1 July 2010; the sole director continued trading while insolvent and allowed drawings, thereby breaching duties in ss 131, 135 and 136 and failing accounting duties, causally contributing to creditor losses; accordingly the company recovered the current account debt from both defendants and the court ordered the director under s 301 to contribute the full creditor loss of $258,810.24 plus interest from the date of liquidation
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 3091
- Parties
- First Plaintiff (company): A & N Contractors (2009) Limited (in liquidation); Second Plaintiffs (liquidators): Henry David Levin and Vivien Judith Madsen-Ries; First Defendant (director and Shareholder): Nicolaas Petrus Liefting; Second Defendant (shareholder): Ngaire Liefting
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Liquidation and Director Liability Under the Companies Act 1993 / Formal Proof Hearing; Judgment Delivered
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Reckless Trading, Misapplication of Company Funds, Shareholder Current Account/drawings, Section 301 Compensation, Accounting Records Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A & N Contractors (2009) Limited (in liquidation)
First Plaintiff (company)
Henry David Levin and Vivien Judith Madsen-Ries
Second Plaintiffs (liquidators)
Nicolaas Petrus Liefting
First Defendant (director and Shareholder)
Ngaire Liefting
Second Defendant (shareholder)
Procedural Posture
Liquidation and Director Liability Under the Companies Act 1993 / Formal Proof Hearing; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments from the company to the defendants constituted a debt on a joint current account repayable on demand
- 2 Whether the director breached duties under ss 131, 135 and 136 of the Companies Act 1993 by trading while insolvent and permitting drawings
- 3 Whether s 301 relief should be ordered to compensate creditors for losses caused by breaches of duty
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the payments were personal drawings on a joint shareholder current account repayable on demand amounting to $294,231.68; the company was insolvent from at least 1 July 2010; the sole director continued trading while insolvent and allowed drawings, thereby breaching duties in ss 131, 135 and 136 and failing accounting duties, causally contributing to creditor losses; accordingly the company recovered the current account debt from both defendants and the court ordered the director under s 301 to contribute the full creditor loss of $258,810.24 plus interest from the date of liquidation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment