REYNOLDS AS LIQUIDATOR OF BAR AND BISTRO LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND ANOR V LOCHIEL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2009-404-501
On the liquidator's affidavit and inquiry under s301(1) the Court was satisfied the second defendant caused the company to incur $156,250 of unsecured liabilities at a time when he had no reasonable grounds to believe the company could meet them, thereby breaching s136; the Court therefore ordered under s301(1)(b)(ii) that he contribute $156,250 to the company, with interest and costs.
- Citation
- openlaw-62768736_7cc8_4bdf_94b9_1bce06932f7e.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Grant Bruce Reynolds as Liquidator of Bar and Bistro Limited (In Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Bar and Bistro Limited (In Liquidation); First Defendant: Lochiel Corporation Limited; Second Defendant: Alexander Miroslav Blagojevic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Company Law / Liquidation Claim Under the Companies Act 1993 / Judgment After Formal Proof (default; Substituted Service)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs; second defendant found to have breached s136 Companies Act 1993 and ordered to contribute to company assets.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Statutory Duties, Reckless Trading/insolvent Transactions, Contribution Orders, Related Party Transactions, Statutory Inquiries Under S301
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grant Bruce Reynolds as Liquidator of Bar and Bistro Limited (In Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
Bar and Bistro Limited (In Liquidation)
Second Plaintiff
Lochiel Corporation Limited
First Defendant
Alexander Miroslav Blagojevic
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Company Law / Liquidation Claim Under the Companies Act 1993 / Judgment After Formal Proof (default; Substituted Service)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second defendant breached s136 of the Companies Act 1993 by causing the company to incur obligations when there were no reasonable grounds to believe the company could perform them
- 2 Whether the Court should, under s301(1)(b)(ii), order the second defendant to contribute to the company's assets
- 3 Determination of the amount for which the second defendant is liable
Ratio Decidendi
On the liquidator's affidavit and inquiry under s301(1) the Court was satisfied the second defendant caused the company to incur $156,250 of unsecured liabilities at a time when he had no reasonable grounds to believe the company could meet them, thereby breaching s136; the Court therefore ordered under s301(1)(b)(ii) that he contribute $156,250 to the company, with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs; second defendant found to have breached s136 Companies Act 1993 and ordered to contribute to company assets.
Orders
- Second defendant to contribute $156,250 to the assets of Bar and Bistro Limited (In Liquidation) pursuant to s301(1)(b)(ii) Companies Act 1993
- Interest from the date of filing of the claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment