SIMUNOVICH FISHERIES LTD AND ORS V TVNZ & ORS HC AK CIV 2004-404-3903
Draft scripts that were forwarded to and held by the defendant's solicitors as part of the process of obtaining legal advice are protected by legal professional privilege and accordingly, while technically discoverable by the defendant, are not producible for inspection; conversely drafts prepared solely for editorial purposes remain discoverable if in the defendant's control; the plaintiffs' application for typed transcripts of documents 245-250 is not authorised under r 312(2) and is dismissed.
- Citation
- openlaw-16c2425a_80bc_466a_98af_e9c1e3ec2419.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Simunovich Fisheries Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Peter Simunovich; Third Plaintiff: Vaughan Wilkinson; First Defendant: Television New Zealand Limited; Second Defendant: Wilson and Horton Limited; Third Defendant: Barine Developments Limited; Fourth Defendant: Neil Penwarden; Fifth Defendant: Thomas Norman Munro Nalder
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory — Discovery Application (r 300 / R 312)
- Outcome
- Application partly dismissed: copies of draft scripts held by solicitors (Simpson Grierson) are subject to legal professional privilege and production for inspection is refused; plaintiffs' application for typed transcription of documents 245-250 is dismissed; defendants awarded costs.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery of Documents, Legal Professional Privilege, Transcription of Illegible Documents, Particulars for Malice/ill Will, Court Rules R 300 and R 312
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simunovich Fisheries Ltd
First Plaintiff
Peter Simunovich
Second Plaintiff
Vaughan Wilkinson
Third Plaintiff
Television New Zealand Limited
First Defendant
Wilson and Horton Limited
Second Defendant
Barine Developments Limited
Third Defendant
Neil Penwarden
Fourth Defendant
Thomas Norman Munro Nalder
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory — Discovery Application (r 300 / R 312)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether draft scripts of TV programme held by defendant's solicitors must be discovered and produced for inspection
- 2 Whether copies of draft scripts sent to solicitors attract legal professional privilege
- 3 Whether second defendant must provide a typed transcript of handwritten documents numbered 245-250
Ratio Decidendi
Draft scripts that were forwarded to and held by the defendant's solicitors as part of the process of obtaining legal advice are protected by legal professional privilege and accordingly, while technically discoverable by the defendant, are not producible for inspection; conversely drafts prepared solely for editorial purposes remain discoverable if in the defendant's control; the plaintiffs' application for typed transcripts of documents 245-250 is not authorised under r 312(2) and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application partly dismissed: copies of draft scripts held by solicitors (Simpson Grierson) are subject to legal professional privilege and production for inspection is refused; plaintiffs' application for typed transcription of documents 245-250 is dismissed; defendants awarded costs.
Orders
- Decline to order production for inspection of draft scripts held by Simpson Grierson on grounds of legal professional privilege
- Plaintiffs' application for typed transcripts of documents numbered 245-250 in the second defendant's list of documents dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment