NACEY v McMASTER [2022] NZHC 546
Where all persons with an interest in the surplus assets who have taken active steps in the litigation consent to the quantum of liquidators' costs and to the proposed distribution, the Court may, by consent, make orders approving those costs and directing distribution under s284 without the usual detailed evidential material.
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 546
- Parties
- Applicants: Richard John Nacey; John Howard Ross Fisk (joint and several liquidators of Marlborough Country Limited (in liquidation)); First Respondents: Gary Richard McMaster; Jaynemarie Gale; Peter Scott Murphy; Stephen John Gale; Second Respondent: Vuelta Investments Limited; Third Respondents: Annie Chan; Jack Chan; Fourth Respondent: H H Hahn Limited; Fifth Respondent: Frederick Paul Pereira; Sixth Respondent: Dominic Chandran; Seventh Respondent: You Seo Lian; Eighth Respondent: Chuah Kim Seng; Ninth Respondent: Sonia Jane Pereira; Tenth Respondent: Marcus Paul Pereira; Eleventh Respondent: Yong Siew Leng; Twelfth Respondent: Francis Brigged
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Directions Under Section 284 Companies Act 1993 / Application for Directions; Parties Reached Settlement and Sought Consent Orders; Court Made Orders by Consent
- Outcome
- Orders made by consent approving the liquidators' costs and disbursements and directing distribution of the surplus assets; proceeding concluded
- Legal Topics
- Distribution of Surplus Assets, Liquidators' Costs Approval, Settlement by Consent, Section 284 Companies Act 1993
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard John Nacey; John Howard Ross Fisk (joint and several liquidators of Marlborough Country Limited (in liquidation))
Applicants
Gary Richard McMaster; Jaynemarie Gale; Peter Scott Murphy; Stephen John Gale
First Respondents
Vuelta Investments Limited
Second Respondent
Annie Chan; Jack Chan
Third Respondents
H H Hahn Limited
Fourth Respondent
Frederick Paul Pereira
Fifth Respondent
Dominic Chandran
Sixth Respondent
You Seo Lian
Seventh Respondent
Chuah Kim Seng
Eighth Respondent
Sonia Jane Pereira
Ninth Respondent
Marcus Paul Pereira
Tenth Respondent
Yong Siew Leng
Eleventh Respondent
Francis Brigged
Twelfth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Directions Under Section 284 Companies Act 1993 / Application for Directions; Parties Reached Settlement and Sought Consent Orders; Court Made Orders by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court may approve liquidators' costs without the usual evidential material where all interested parties consent
- 2 Whether the Court should make directions for distribution of surplus assets by consent under s284
- 3 Whether liquidators should step back when shareholders advance competing claims
Ratio Decidendi
Where all persons with an interest in the surplus assets who have taken active steps in the litigation consent to the quantum of liquidators' costs and to the proposed distribution, the Court may, by consent, make orders approving those costs and directing distribution under s284 without the usual detailed evidential material.
Court Disposition
Orders made by consent approving the liquidators' costs and disbursements and directing distribution of the surplus assets; proceeding concluded
Orders
- Orders made in terms of paragraphs (3)(a) and (3)(b) of the joint memorandum of counsel dated 22 March 2022 approving the liquidators' costs and disbursements
- Orders directing distribution of the surplus assets in accordance with the consent memorandum; proceeding dismissed as concluded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment