HUNTER GRAIN LIMITED AND ANOR V RICHARD WILLIAM PRICE AND ORS HC TAU CIV-2008-470-192
The court held that the implied undertaking applied to the McKenzie catalogue and to the identified emails of 3 December 2007 and 7 January 2008 and that sending the 9 October 2007 email to third parties and disclosing the listed catalogue particulars was a breach; the action plan, released in error, was properly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-7b0c4501_c102_4ebd_b43c_3818dbef543a.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Hunter Grain Limited; Second Plaintiff: Rossod Holdings Limited; First Defendant: Richard William Price; Second Defendant: Price Commodities Limited; Third Defendant: R W Price, T L Price and S W E Swap as trustees of a Price Family Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Litigation Commercial Dispute (high Court) / Review of Interlocutory Decision (application to Review Associate Judge's Orders on Strike Out and Leave to Use Discovered Documents)
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed; Associate Judge Doogue's orders upheld; leave granted to use documents discovered in this proceeding in the related Swap proceeding subject to further directions
- Legal Topics
- Implied Undertaking Not to Use Discovered Documents, Use of Discovered Documents in Related Proceedings, Leave to Use Discovered Documents, Strike Out for Abuse of Process, Search and Seizure Orders and Cataloguing, Sanctions for Breach of Undertaking
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hunter Grain Limited
First Plaintiff
Rossod Holdings Limited
Second Plaintiff
Richard William Price
First Defendant
Price Commodities Limited
Second Defendant
R W Price, T L Price and S W E Swap as trustees of a Price Family Trust
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation Commercial Dispute (high Court) / Review of Interlocutory Decision (application to Review Associate Judge's Orders on Strike Out and Leave to Use Discovered Documents)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether publication/use of discovered material to third parties breached the implied undertaking and express undertaking
- 2 Whether the McKenzie catalogue and listed email summaries are subject to the implied undertaking
- 3 Whether the action plan was released in error and whether its use breached the undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the implied undertaking applied to the McKenzie catalogue and to the identified emails of 3 December 2007 and 7 January 2008 and that sending the 9 October 2007 email to third parties and disclosing the listed catalogue particulars was a breach; the action plan, released in error, was properly treated by plaintiffs as a business record and its use did not breach the undertaking; the breaches were not deliberate or contumacious and strike out or stay would be disproportionate; given the special circumstances including misappropriation of the hard drive by Price and that the breaches did not materially cause the issue of the Swap proceedings, leave to use discovered...
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed; Associate Judge Doogue's orders upheld; leave granted to use documents discovered in this proceeding in the related Swap proceeding subject to further directions
Orders
- Review dismissed
- Leave granted to the plaintiffs to use documents discovered in HC Tauranga CIV-2008-470-192 in the related Swap proceedings (HC Tauranga CIV-2008-470-837) subject to further hearing to establish protocol and resolve privilege and confidentiality issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment