The Marianne Caughey Smith-Preston Memorial Rest Homes Trust Board [2018] NZHC 3014
Clause 5(53) of the will establishes the primary charitable purpose as the provision and operation of Rest Home(s) for aged, infirm or impecunious women; outdoor relief is authorised only as an ancillary adjunct to the Rest Home purpose and not as a standalone primary purpose; the Court has jurisdiction under s66 to give directions; trustees have power under the will and s14 Trustee Act 1956 to sell Upland Home and apply proceeds for the Trust's purposes; the Trust Board's proposed broad direction permitting general outdoor relief was declined and variation should proceed by appropriate scheme if required.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 3014
- Parties
- Applicant (trust Board): The Marianne Caughey Smith-Preston Memorial Rest Homes Trust Board; Intervener (on Behalf of the Crown Supervising Charities): Attorney-General; Settlor / Testatrix: Marianne Caughey Preston (deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Directions Under S 66 Trustee Act 1956 Concerning a Charitable Trust / Hearing on Interpretation of Trust Deed and Trustee Powers; Judgment on Application for Directions
- Outcome
- Application granted in part and refused in part: directions interpreting beneficiary class and confirming trustee powers to apply funds for Rest Home purposes and to sell Upland Home were granted; direction authorising standalone general outdoor relief was refused; costs of proceedings ordered to be paid from the...
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Trust Deed, Section 66 Trustee Act Directions, Cy Pres / Scheme Procedure, Trustee Powers to Sell Trust Property, Indoor Vs Outdoor Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Marianne Caughey Smith-Preston Memorial Rest Homes Trust Board
Applicant (trust Board)
Attorney-General
Intervener (on Behalf of the Crown Supervising Charities)
Marianne Caughey Preston (deceased)
Settlor / Testatrix
Procedural Posture
Application for Directions Under S 66 Trustee Act 1956 Concerning a Charitable Trust / Hearing on Interpretation of Trust Deed and Trustee Powers; Judgment on Application for Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clause 5(53) of the will to identify the Trust's purpose
- 2 Whether the Trust empowers standalone 'outdoor relief' as a primary purpose or only as an adjunct to Rest Homes
- 3 Scope of the Court's jurisdiction under s 66 Trustee Act 1956 to give directions
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 5(53) of the will establishes the primary charitable purpose as the provision and operation of Rest Home(s) for aged, infirm or impecunious women; outdoor relief is authorised only as an ancillary adjunct to the Rest Home purpose and not as a standalone primary purpose; the Court has jurisdiction under s66 to give directions; trustees have power under the will and s14 Trustee Act 1956 to sell Upland Home and apply proceeds for the Trust's purposes; the Trust Board's proposed broad direction permitting general outdoor relief was declined and variation should proceed by appropriate scheme if required.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part and refused in part: directions interpreting beneficiary class and confirming trustee powers to apply funds for Rest Home purposes and to sell Upland Home were granted; direction authorising standalone general outdoor relief was refused; costs of proceedings ordered to be paid from the...
Orders
- The phrase 'aged infirm or impecunious' in clause 5(53) is to be read disjunctively as 'aged and/or infirm and/or impecunious'.
- The Trust Board has power to apply the Trust Fund to meet the Trust's purposes as identified in this judgment, namely the establishment and operation of Rest Home(s) for the benefit of aged, infirm or impecunious women, and associated benefits ancillary to those Homes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment