GOODSON AND ORS V WINGATE TWO LIMITED AND ORS HC WN CIV-2008-485-1942
The Court approved the transfer because the liquidator demonstrated the transfer would not prejudice Lago's creditors, would facilitate a tax‑efficient sale likely to increase returns to creditors, preserve vendor finance arrangements, would not extinguish inter se claims between shareholders, and the application...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-769fc356_f181_4089_b976_0904c4d42f03.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON; Second Plaintiffs: PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON, PATRICIA FRANCES GOODSON AND MARTIN WILLIAM ALLARDICE; Third Plaintiffs: PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON, PATRICIA FRANCES GOODSON AND DAVID ALLAN PORTER; First Defendant: WINGATE TWO LIMITED; Second Defendant: TRADING HOLDINGS LIMITED; Third Defendant: LAGO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application Under Companies Act 1993 for Court Approval of Share Transfer (s 248(1)(d)) / Interlocutory; Application for Court Consent to Transfer Shares of a Company in Liquidation; Reserved Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Application granted. Court approved transfer of Trading Holdings' shares from Lago Enterprises Limited to Peterkin Land Two Limited under s 248(1)(d).
- Legal Topics
- Liquidation, Share Transfer During Liquidation, Court Consent Under S 248(1)(d), Vendor Finance, Creditor Protection, Tax Deferral
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON
First Plaintiff
PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON, PATRICIA FRANCES GOODSON AND MARTIN WILLIAM ALLARDICE
Second Plaintiffs
PETER JEREMY DAWSON GOODSON, PATRICIA FRANCES GOODSON AND DAVID ALLAN PORTER
Third Plaintiffs
WINGATE TWO LIMITED
First Defendant
TRADING HOLDINGS LIMITED
Second Defendant
LAGO ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application Under Companies Act 1993 for Court Approval of Share Transfer (s 248(1)(d)) / Interlocutory; Application for Court Consent to Transfer Shares of a Company in Liquidation; Reserved Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order transfer of shares of a company in liquidation contrary to s 248(1)(d)
- 2 Whether the proposed transfer would prejudice creditors of the company in liquidation
- 3 Whether the proposed structure preserves vendor finance and achieves tax deferral benefits
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the transfer because the liquidator demonstrated the transfer would not prejudice Lago's creditors, would facilitate a tax‑efficient sale likely to increase returns to creditors, preserve vendor finance arrangements, would not extinguish inter se claims between shareholders, and the application proceeded uncontested.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Court approved transfer of Trading Holdings' shares from Lago Enterprises Limited to Peterkin Land Two Limited under s 248(1)(d).
Orders
- Court approves transfer of all shares in Trading Holdings Limited from Lago Enterprises Limited to Peterkin Land Two Limited pursuant to s 248(1)(d) of the Companies Act 1993
- No costs ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment