ORAKA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v GEOSTEL VISION LIMITED [2018] NZHC 769
The Court held Technologies was entitled to a notional licence fee assessed as a reasonable royalty at the date of infringement (mid-2001); Geostel, as main beneficiary of the breach, is the appropriate notional licensee; after weighing the cup's importance, available alternatives (design-around, offshore manufacture), competitive pressure from the incumbent licensee Graders, and commercial realities, a reasonable licence fee is $6.00 per cup assembly; applied to 85,000 cup assembly equivalents the award is $510,000, with interest and costs reserved for further submissions.
- Citation
- (2018) 131 IPR 363
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Oraka Technologies Limited; Second Plaintiff: Oraka Graders Limited; Third Plaintiff: Michael William Schwarz; First Defendant: Geostel Vision Limited; Second Defendant: Paul Daynes; Second Defendant: Gordon Robertson; Third Defendant: Napier Tool & Die Co Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement (intellectual Property) / Remitted to High Court for Assessment of Quantum by Notional Licence Fee (damages Assessment)
- Outcome
- Judgment for first plaintiff Oraka Technologies Limited against all defendants for NZD 510000; interest and costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- Notional Licence Fee, User Principle, Damages Assessment, Lost Profits, Apportionment, Design Around Alternatives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oraka Technologies Limited
First Plaintiff
Oraka Graders Limited
Second Plaintiff
Michael William Schwarz
Third Plaintiff
Geostel Vision Limited
First Defendant
Paul Daynes
Second Defendant
Gordon Robertson
Second Defendant
Napier Tool & Die Co Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement (intellectual Property) / Remitted to High Court for Assessment of Quantum by Notional Licence Fee (damages Assessment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of damages for copyright infringement based on a notional licence fee
- 2 Identification of parties to the hypothetical negotiation (licensor and licensee)
- 3 Appropriate date for assessment of the notional licence fee
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held Technologies was entitled to a notional licence fee assessed as a reasonable royalty at the date of infringement (mid-2001); Geostel, as main beneficiary of the breach, is the appropriate notional licensee; after weighing the cup's importance, available alternatives (design-around, offshore manufacture), competitive pressure from the incumbent licensee Graders, and commercial realities, a reasonable licence fee is $6.00 per cup assembly; applied to 85,000 cup assembly equivalents the award is $510,000, with interest and costs reserved for further submissions.
Court Disposition
Judgment for first plaintiff Oraka Technologies Limited against all defendants for NZD 510000; interest and costs reserved
Orders
- Judgment for the first plaintiff in the sum of NZD 510,000
- First plaintiff to file submissions on interest by 4 May 2018
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment