GILL v K B CONTRACTING & QUARRIES LIMITED [2020] NZHC 1493
The court approved the proposal because it complied with s327, adequate notice to creditors was demonstrated, a sufficient majority in value of voting creditors supported the proposal, the proposed payment schedule would approximately repay creditors in full, and no statutory ground under s333(3) to refuse approval was established.
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 1493
- Parties
- Insolvent: David Gill; Creditor: KB Contracting and Quarries Limited; Creditor: Stellar Collections Limited trading as MFL Services / Creditwork Recoveries (collecting on behalf of Porter Hire Limited and Hynds Pipesystems); Creditor: Latitude Financial Services Limited trading as Gem; Creditor: Milton Graham Limited; Creditor: Flexicards Limited trading as QCard; Creditor: ASB Bank Limited; Creditor: Baycorp NZ Limited; Creditor: Harmoney Limited; Provisional Trustee: Christine Liggins
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Proposal Approval Under Part 5 Insolvency Act 2006 / Application for Court Approval of Proposal Decided
- Outcome
- Order approving the proposal
- Legal Topics
- Proposal Approval, Creditor Voting, Service of Documents, Trustee Duties, Credit Agency Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Gill
Insolvent
KB Contracting and Quarries Limited
Creditor
Stellar Collections Limited trading as MFL Services / Creditwork Recoveries (collecting on behalf of Porter Hire Limited and Hynds Pipesystems)
Creditor
Latitude Financial Services Limited trading as Gem
Creditor
Milton Graham Limited
Creditor
Flexicards Limited trading as QCard
Creditor
ASB Bank Limited
Creditor
Baycorp NZ Limited
Creditor
Harmoney Limited
Creditor
Christine Liggins
Provisional Trustee
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Proposal Approval Under Part 5 Insolvency Act 2006 / Application for Court Approval of Proposal Decided
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposal complied with statutory form and accompanying statement of assets under s327
- 2 Whether all creditors received notice of the proposal and the application
- 3 Whether the court should approve the proposal under s333(3) given creditor support
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the proposal because it complied with s327, adequate notice to creditors was demonstrated, a sufficient majority in value of voting creditors supported the proposal, the proposed payment schedule would approximately repay creditors in full, and no statutory ground under s333(3) to refuse approval was established.
Court Disposition
Order approving the proposal
Orders
- Order approving the proposal by David Gill under Part 5, Subpart 2 of the Insolvency Act 2006 lodged with the Court on 4 October 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment