PRASAD v MAHARAJ [2019] NZHC 1914
The court dismissed the second proposal under s333 because the applicant failed to discharge the burden of showing a material change or provide reliable, cogent evidence as to how the proposal would be funded and sustained; public interest concerns arising from the insolvent's history of trading while insolvent and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 1914
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Rajveen Prasad; Judgment Debtor / Insolvent: Ashok Maharaj; Trustee: Roshni Chauhan; Proposed Funder / Related Entity: Keyline Homes & Projects Ltd; Creditor: Westminster Finance Limited; Creditor: Dysart Timbers Limited; Creditor: Fieldmanukau Holdings Limited (trading as MITRE 10 MEGAMANUKAU); Creditor: Kennards Hire New Zealand Limited; Creditor: Nick Nandkishore; Creditor: Robert John Warburton; Creditor: Ronald Ravindra Prasad; Creditor: Wastemanagement NZ Limited; Creditor: Warburton Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency / Bankruptcy / Application for Approval of Second Proposal Under S333 and Adjournment of Adjudication for Bankruptcy Under S13; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Application for approval of the second proposal dismissed under s333 of the Insolvency Act 2006; bankruptcy adjudication proceedings adjourned to allow future determination.
- Legal Topics
- Proposal Approval S333, Adjudication of Bankruptcy S13, Trading While Insolvent, Creditors' Meeting and Voting, Public Interest in Insolvency
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajveen Prasad
Judgment Creditor
Ashok Maharaj
Judgment Debtor / Insolvent
Roshni Chauhan
Trustee
Keyline Homes & Projects Ltd
Proposed Funder / Related Entity
Westminster Finance Limited
Creditor
Dysart Timbers Limited
Creditor
Fieldmanukau Holdings Limited (trading as MITRE 10 MEGAMANUKAU)
Creditor
Kennards Hire New Zealand Limited
Creditor
Nick Nandkishore
Creditor
Robert John Warburton
Creditor
Ronald Ravindra Prasad
Creditor
Wastemanagement NZ Limited
Creditor
Warburton Limited
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Insolvency / Bankruptcy / Application for Approval of Second Proposal Under S333 and Adjournment of Adjudication for Bankruptcy Under S13; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second proposal met statutory requirements under ss327–332 and should be approved under s333
- 2 Whether there was a material change of circumstances or sufficient new evidence to warrant overturning the prior rejection
- 3 Whether the proposed funding was adequately evidenced and the insolvent would meet ongoing payment obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The court dismissed the second proposal under s333 because the applicant failed to discharge the burden of showing a material change or provide reliable, cogent evidence as to how the proposal would be funded and sustained; public interest concerns arising from the insolvent's history of trading while insolvent and inadequate proof of commercial reliability made approval inexpedient.
Court Disposition
Application for approval of the second proposal dismissed under s333 of the Insolvency Act 2006; bankruptcy adjudication proceedings adjourned to allow future determination.
Orders
- Application for approval of the proposal dismissed pursuant to s333 of the Insolvency Act 2006
- No order as to costs (no opposing party)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment