SUSAN SPENCER V MYLES JOHN PRESTIDGE AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-187
Because the insolvent's settlement was only communicated on the hearing date after substantial preparation by the official assignee and because the official assignee had reasonable grounds (deficiencies in the proposal and evidence of undisclosed companies/trust and a significant asset sale) to seek a priority fixture, the court awarded the official assignee costs on a 2B basis including full-day preparation costs and costs for the priority fixture, plus disbursements as fixed by the registrar.
- Citation
- openlaw-78d6e217_9285_493d_b95f_5c1cb804ab46.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff (insolvent; Proposer): Susan Spencer; Respondent (adjudication Applicant): Myles John Prestidge; Objector (official Assignee): Official Assignee in Bankruptcy of the property of Kim Hilton Spencer
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Approval of a Proposal Under Part XV of the Insolvency Act 1967 and Related Adjudication Proceedings / Hearing Fixed 25 February 2008; Proposal Withdrawn and Adjudication Application Withdrawn; Post Withdrawal Application for Costs Determined
- Outcome
- Official Assignee awarded costs against the insolvent; costs assessed on a 2B basis including full-day preparation and priority fixture costs; disbursements awarded as fixed by the registrar.
- Legal Topics
- Proposal Under Part XV, Approval of Proposal, Costs for Preparation, Priority Fixture, Disclosure of Assets and Companies, Statement of Affairs, Disbursements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Spencer
Plaintiff (insolvent; Proposer)
Myles John Prestidge
Respondent (adjudication Applicant)
Official Assignee in Bankruptcy of the property of Kim Hilton Spencer
Objector (official Assignee)
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of a Proposal Under Part XV of the Insolvency Act 1967 and Related Adjudication Proceedings / Hearing Fixed 25 February 2008; Proposal Withdrawn and Adjudication Application Withdrawn; Post Withdrawal Application for Costs Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether official assignee entitled to costs for full-day preparation despite hearing taking a quarter day
- 2 Whether insolvent should pay costs for application for a priority fixture
- 3 Whether deficiencies in the proposal and nondisclosure justified expedited steps and additional costs
Ratio Decidendi
Because the insolvent's settlement was only communicated on the hearing date after substantial preparation by the official assignee and because the official assignee had reasonable grounds (deficiencies in the proposal and evidence of undisclosed companies/trust and a significant asset sale) to seek a priority fixture, the court awarded the official assignee costs on a 2B basis including full-day preparation costs and costs for the priority fixture, plus disbursements as fixed by the registrar.
Court Disposition
Official Assignee awarded costs against the insolvent; costs assessed on a 2B basis including full-day preparation and priority fixture costs; disbursements awarded as fixed by the registrar.
Orders
- Insolvent to pay official assignee costs assessed on a 2B basis including costs for preparing for a full day hearing on 25 February 2008.
- Insolvent to pay official assignee costs incurred in applying for a priority fixture.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment