DENISE MINNIE SHAILER v WAYNE LAWRENCE SHAILER, DENISE MINNIE SHAILER AND CHARLES JOHN ANDREWS [2015] NZHC 250

DENISE MINNIE SHAILER v WAYNE LAWRENCE SHAILER, DENISE MINNIE SHAILER AND CHARLES JOHN ANDREWS [2015] NZHC 250

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine an enforcement action against trustees for a debt owed to a spouse even where the debt constitutes relationship property because the claim is not an 'application under this Act' requiring Family Court determination; s 19 preserves the plaintiff's right to deal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZHC 250
Parties
Plaintiff and Second Named Defendant (trustee): Denise Minnie Shailer; First Named Defendant (trustee): Wayne Lawrence Shailer; Third Named Defendant (former Trustee / Bare Trustee): Charles John Andrews
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
24 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment Application (high Court) / Summary Judgment Hearing and Interlocutory Directions
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff; plaintiff entitled to summary judgment but final form of judgment and allocation of liabilities among trustees deferred pending further submissions.
Legal Topics
Relationship Property, Trustee Liability and Indemnity, Jurisdiction (family Court V High Court), Summary Judgment Standard, Equitable Set Off, Enforcement of Debts Against Trustees
Family Law Trusts Civil Procedure Equity Property Law Relationship Property Trustee Liability and Indemnity Jurisdiction (family Court V High Court) +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Denise Minnie Shailer

Plaintiff and Second Named Defendant (trustee)

Wayne Lawrence Shailer

First Named Defendant (trustee)

Charles John Andrews

Third Named Defendant (former Trustee / Bare Trustee)

Procedural Posture

Civil Summary Judgment Application (high Court) / Summary Judgment Hearing and Interlocutory Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear enforcement of a debt owed to a spouse where the debt constitutes relationship property
  2. 2 Whether the Property Relationships Act 1976 must be applied to the High Court proceeding and whether s 4(4) compels treating the claim as if under the Act
  3. 3 Whether the Trust is entitled to equitable set-off against the plaintiff's claim by asserting a partnership debt owed to the Trust

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine an enforcement action against trustees for a debt owed to a spouse even where the debt constitutes relationship property because the claim is not an 'application under this Act' requiring Family Court determination; s 19 preserves the plaintiff's right to deal with and enforce her chose in action; s 4(4) and other Act provisions do not create an arguable legal defence in this proceeding; the asserted equitable set-off by reference to a partnership debt was not supported by sufficient particulars or evidence to be an arguable defence; therefore summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff is appropriate, subject to further submissions on...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff; plaintiff entitled to summary judgment but final form of judgment and allocation of liabilities among trustees deferred pending further submissions.

Orders

  • Plaintiff to file memorandum on the final form of judgment within one month of date of judgment
  • First-named defendant and third-named defendant may file memoranda in reply within 21 days of receipt of plaintiff's memorandum