SMITH v PENNEY & ANOR [2013] NZHC 2727
The Court exercised its statutory power under s 51 of the Trustee Act 1956 to remove the present trustees (unless they resigned within the specified short period) and to appoint two consenting and appropriate replacement trustees (Nole Ronald Irvine and Michael Charles Taylor), and ordered the present trustees to transfer all trust assets and records to the new trustees.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 2727
- Parties
- Plaintiff (trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust): Nigel Philip Smith; First Defendant (personal Capacity and Trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust): Stephen Charles Penney; Second Defendant (personal Capacity and Trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust): Donna Maria Simunovich
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Litigation / Application to Set Aside Judgment and Appointment of New Trustees (interlocutory Oral Judgment)
- Outcome
- Present trustees removed (subject to short resignation window) and replaced by Nole Ronald Irvine and Michael Charles Taylor; present trustees ordered to transfer assets and deliver records; new trustees granted leave to intervene; matter listed for review.
- Legal Topics
- Removal and Appointment of Trustees, Section 51 Trustee Act 1956, Setting Aside Judgment, Transfer of Trust Property and Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Philip Smith
Plaintiff (trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust)
Stephen Charles Penney
First Defendant (personal Capacity and Trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust)
Donna Maria Simunovich
Second Defendant (personal Capacity and Trustee of the Maria Charles Family Trust)
Procedural Posture
Trust Litigation / Application to Set Aside Judgment and Appointment of New Trustees (interlocutory Oral Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment entered against a trustee should be set aside
- 2 Whether the present trustees should be removed and replaced under s 51 Trustee Act 1956
- 3 Which persons are appropriate to be appointed as new trustees
Ratio Decidendi
The Court exercised its statutory power under s 51 of the Trustee Act 1956 to remove the present trustees (unless they resigned within the specified short period) and to appoint two consenting and appropriate replacement trustees (Nole Ronald Irvine and Michael Charles Taylor), and ordered the present trustees to transfer all trust assets and records to the new trustees.
Court Disposition
Present trustees removed (subject to short resignation window) and replaced by Nole Ronald Irvine and Michael Charles Taylor; present trustees ordered to transfer assets and deliver records; new trustees granted leave to intervene; matter listed for review.
Orders
- Pursuant to s 51 Trustee Act 1956 present trustees (Donna Maria Simunovich, Stephen Charles Penney and Nigel Philip Smith) to resign within two working days or be removed as trustees as at 5.00 pm on Tuesday 22 October 2013
- Pursuant to s 51 Trustee Act 1956 Nole Ronald Irvine (or a trustee company nominated and controlled by him) and Michael Charles Taylor (or a trustee company nominated and controlled by him) to be appointed trustees effective from the resignations or 5.00 pm on Tuesday 22 October 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment