MUDGWAY AND ORS V SLACK AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2010-404-2058
Given the conflict positions of the current trustees, their failure or unwillingness to protect the beneficiaries' interests and to provide information or comply with Family Court orders, it was expedient to remove the existing trustees and appoint the Public Trust as sole trustee pursuant to the Court's powers under s51 Trustee Act 1956 and its inherent jurisdiction; the trust deed must be amended to vest the power to appoint and remove trustees in the Public Trust to secure the beneficiaries' welfare, and consequential vesting of the trust property and removal of the plaintiff's notice of claim were ordered, while further bespoke remedial orders were reserved pending the Public Trust's...
- Citation
- openlaw-eb6bb284_a10c_42c1_aabc_fd780706b1c1.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Nicola Jane Mudgway; Second Plaintiff: Sophia Jane Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart; Third Plaintiff: Gabriella Lili Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart; Fourth Plaintiff: Madison Lee Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart; First Defendant: Timothy Upton Slack; Second Defendant: Nigel Hugh Beck
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trustee Act 1956 for Removal and Appointment of Trustees (trusts Litigation) / High Court Judgment on Application (final)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: existing trustees removed and Public Trust appointed; trust deed varied; property vested in Public Trust; certain further relief reserved
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustees, Appointment of Public Trust as Trustee, Variation of Trust Deed (administrative Provision), Occupation Order Enforcement, Trustees' Duties and Conflicts of Interest, Disclosure and Discovery by Trustees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicola Jane Mudgway
First Plaintiff
Sophia Jane Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart
Second Plaintiff
Gabriella Lili Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart
Third Plaintiff
Madison Lee Mudgway (minor) by her guardian ad litem Roderick Hugh Stewart
Fourth Plaintiff
Timothy Upton Slack
First Defendant
Nigel Hugh Beck
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trustee Act 1956 for Removal and Appointment of Trustees (trusts Litigation) / High Court Judgment on Application (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is expedient to remove existing trustees of the Madison Family Trust
- 2 Whether the Public Trust should be appointed sole trustee under s51 Trustee Act 1956
- 3 Whether the trust deed should be varied to transfer appointment/removal power from the settlor to the Public Trust
Ratio Decidendi
Given the conflict positions of the current trustees, their failure or unwillingness to protect the beneficiaries' interests and to provide information or comply with Family Court orders, it was expedient to remove the existing trustees and appoint the Public Trust as sole trustee pursuant to the Court's powers under s51 Trustee Act 1956 and its inherent jurisdiction; the trust deed must be amended to vest the power to appoint and remove trustees in the Public Trust to secure the beneficiaries' welfare, and consequential vesting of the trust property and removal of the plaintiff's notice of claim were ordered, while further bespoke remedial orders were reserved pending the Public Trust's...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: existing trustees removed and Public Trust appointed; trust deed varied; property vested in Public Trust; certain further relief reserved
Orders
- Timothy Upton Slack and/or Nigel Hugh Beck are removed as trustees of the Madison Family Trust
- The Public Trust (Auckland) is appointed as sole trustee pursuant to s51(1) Trustee Act 1956
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment