YOLANDE ELISABETH MARK AND IAN FREDERICK RANKINE AND ORS V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND ORS HC WN CIV 2002-485-799
Although the subject lands were originally acquired for a Wellington–Foxton motorway, by December 1985 the Crown no longer intended to build a motorway on that corridor; nevertheless the lands continued to be legitimately held and required for another public work (a bypass/local arterial/Western Link Road) such that s40(1)(b) operated and no statutory obligation to offer the lands back arose; plaintiffs retained standing and limitation did not bar declaratory relief but substantive declarations were refused.
- Citation
- openlaw-1fab4e69_1f74_4340_9512_0dedf80a5cb8.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Yolande Elisabeth Mark; First Plaintiff: Ian Frederick Rankine; Second Plaintiffs: Ellen Annand Clunie & Ors; Third Plaintiffs: Margaret Rose Johnson & Ors; Fourth Plaintiffs: John Bryan Cudby & Ors; Fifth Plaintiffs: Bruce Lockwood Fenwick & Ors; First Defendant: The Attorney-General; Second Defendant: Chief Executive, Land Information New Zealand; Third Defendant: New Zealand Transport Agency; Fourth Defendant: Kapiti Coast District Council
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Declaratory (public Works Act S40) / Judgment Following Trial/hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' declaratory relief declined; substantive declarations that Crown must offer back lands under s40 PWA refused; judgment for defendants on merits
- Legal Topics
- Section 40 Public Works Act Offer Back, Designation and Middle Line Proclamations, Successor Rights and Survivorship, Standing and Assignment of Statutory Rights, Limitation and Declaratory Relief, Designation Process Under RMA, Surplus Land Disposal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yolande Elisabeth Mark
First Plaintiff
Ian Frederick Rankine
First Plaintiff
Ellen Annand Clunie & Ors
Second Plaintiffs
Margaret Rose Johnson & Ors
Third Plaintiffs
John Bryan Cudby & Ors
Fourth Plaintiffs
Bruce Lockwood Fenwick & Ors
Fifth Plaintiffs
The Attorney-General
First Defendant
Chief Executive, Land Information New Zealand
Second Defendant
New Zealand Transport Agency
Third Defendant
Kapiti Coast District Council
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Declaratory (public Works Act S40) / Judgment Following Trial/hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether land taken for Wellington-Foxton motorway had to be offered back under s40 PWA
- 2 Whether plaintiffs had standing or had unlawfully assigned s40 rights
- 3 When, if at all, the Crown ceased to require land for the motorway and timing of offer-back
Ratio Decidendi
Although the subject lands were originally acquired for a Wellington–Foxton motorway, by December 1985 the Crown no longer intended to build a motorway on that corridor; nevertheless the lands continued to be legitimately held and required for another public work (a bypass/local arterial/Western Link Road) such that s40(1)(b) operated and no statutory obligation to offer the lands back arose; plaintiffs retained standing and limitation did not bar declaratory relief but substantive declarations were refused.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' declaratory relief declined; substantive declarations that Crown must offer back lands under s40 PWA refused; judgment for defendants on merits
Orders
- Decline to grant the declarations sought by the plaintiffs that the defendants were required to offer back the subject lands under s40 Public Works Act 1981
- Proceedings dismissed on substantive grounds to the extent they sought offers back for the subject lands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment