SOPHIE LAI aka SHU-HWA LAI v LIU SHUN-MEI HUANG [2019] NZHC 115
There was no material change of circumstances: the first plaintiff's alleged impecuniosity was already assessed when the original order was made, the $5,000 payout of security was consensual and not material, and given the proximity of the trial, absence of a requested stay, modesty of the shortfall and ongoing payments, increased security for costs was refused.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 115
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: SOPHIE LAI aka SHU-HWA LAI; Second Plaintiff: RICHARD HUANG; Third Plaintiff: GINI HUANG; First Defendant: LIU SHUN-MEI HUANG as executrix of the ESTATE OF HSIU-LIN HUANG; Second Defendant: CHUN-CHING HUANG; Third Defendant: CHUN-TA HUANG; Fourth Defendants: LIU SHUN-MEI HUANG and CHUN-CHING HUANG as trustees of the SONG LIN FAMILY TRUST
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 7 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceedings Concerning Estate and Trust With Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory Application for Additional Security for Costs (hearing 7 February 2019); Substantive Trial Scheduled March 2019
- Outcome
- Application for additional security for costs dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Impecuniosity, Material Change of Circumstances, Strike Out, Testamentary Claims, Trustees' Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SOPHIE LAI aka SHU-HWA LAI
First Plaintiff
RICHARD HUANG
Second Plaintiff
GINI HUANG
Third Plaintiff
LIU SHUN-MEI HUANG as executrix of the ESTATE OF HSIU-LIN HUANG
First Defendant
CHUN-CHING HUANG
Second Defendant
CHUN-TA HUANG
Third Defendant
LIU SHUN-MEI HUANG and CHUN-CHING HUANG as trustees of the SONG LIN FAMILY TRUST
Fourth Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceedings Concerning Estate and Trust With Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory Application for Additional Security for Costs (hearing 7 February 2019); Substantive Trial Scheduled March 2019
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a material change of circumstances since the original security for costs order such as to justify increased security
- 2 Whether the first plaintiff is sufficiently impecunious to justify increased security
- 3 Whether the partial payout of existing security is a material change
Ratio Decidendi
There was no material change of circumstances: the first plaintiff's alleged impecuniosity was already assessed when the original order was made, the $5,000 payout of security was consensual and not material, and given the proximity of the trial, absence of a requested stay, modesty of the shortfall and ongoing payments, increased security for costs was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for additional security for costs dismissed
Orders
- Declined to order increased security for costs
- No order as to costs on this application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment