ABURN AND ANOR V TERAWHITI FARMING CO LIMITED AND ORS HC AK CIV-2006-404-007541
Leave under r458D(1)(e) was granted because the disputed entry in the company's register resulted from an apparent transcription mistake producing a prohibited trust entry rather than naming personal representatives; the issue is procedural, straightforward to determine under s91, and in the interests of justice to resolve promptly by originating application under Part 4A rather than full Part 4 procedures.
- Citation
- openlaw-b26374cf_6bf6_4b19_baac_57fa1c1254da.pdf
- Parties
- First Applicant: John Edward Aburn; First Applicant: Donald Leroy Francis; First Applicant: Joanna Gordon Grace; Second Applicant: Alison Joan Cook; Second Applicant: Donald Leroy Francis; First Respondent: Terawhiti Farming Co. Limited; Second Respondent: Alastair Charles Wright; Third Respondent: Paul James Laing; Fourth Respondent: William Russell Grace
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Rectification of Share Register Under S91 Companies Act 1993 / Application for Leave Under R458 D(1)(e) to Commence by Originating Application (part 4 A)
- Outcome
- Application for leave granted
- Legal Topics
- Share Register Rectification, Originating Application Under Part 4 a, Directors' Duties to Maintain Register, Trust Entries on Share Register
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Edward Aburn
First Applicant
Donald Leroy Francis
First Applicant
Joanna Gordon Grace
First Applicant
Alison Joan Cook
Second Applicant
Donald Leroy Francis
Second Applicant
Terawhiti Farming Co. Limited
First Respondent
Alastair Charles Wright
Second Respondent
Paul James Laing
Third Respondent
William Russell Grace
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rectification of Share Register Under S91 Companies Act 1993 / Application for Leave Under R458 D(1)(e) to Commence by Originating Application (part 4 A)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted under r458D(1)(e) to commence a s91 rectification application by Part 4A originating application
- 2 Whether the rectification claim is a simple procedural matter suitable for Part 4A or whether it is intertwined with broader substantive disputes requiring Part 4 procedure
Ratio Decidendi
Leave under r458D(1)(e) was granted because the disputed entry in the company's register resulted from an apparent transcription mistake producing a prohibited trust entry rather than naming personal representatives; the issue is procedural, straightforward to determine under s91, and in the interests of justice to resolve promptly by originating application under Part 4A rather than full Part 4 procedures.
Court Disposition
Application for leave granted
Orders
- Leave granted to commence the s91 Companies Act 1993 rectification proceeding by originating application under Part 4A High Court Rules pursuant to r458D(1)(e)
- Costs awarded to the first and second applicants on a category 2B basis with disbursements as fixed by the Registrar
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment