LUSTY and BROWNE as executors of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty v C M THORBURN and C E THORBURN as trustees of the THORBURN TRUST [2019] NZHC 2610
The plaintiffs' summary judgment application was dismissed because it is arguable the lease was granted in breach of the trustee's duties by a grossly inadequate and capped rent that could operate in perpetuity, the adequacy of consideration paid is not established, and there are significant factual issues (including knowledge and dealings between the parties and solicitors' involvement) requiring trial rather than summary disposal.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2610
- Parties
- Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty: Aileen Beryl Lusty; Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty: Ronald Hunt Lusty; Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty: Warwick James Roland Browne; Defendant Trustee of the Thorburn Trust: Craig Maxwell Thorburn; Defendant Trustee of the Thorburn Trust: Carly Eve Thorburn
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Specific Performance and Declaratory Relief Concerning Lease Renewal Under Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 and Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' application for summary judgment dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Breach of Trust, Lease Renewal (perpetuity), Glasgow Lease, Knowing Receipt, Trust Instrument Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aileen Beryl Lusty
Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty
Ronald Hunt Lusty
Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty
Warwick James Roland Browne
Plaintiff Executor of the Estate of Kenneth Richard Lusty
Craig Maxwell Thorburn
Defendant Trustee of the Thorburn Trust
Carly Eve Thorburn
Defendant Trustee of the Thorburn Trust
Procedural Posture
Specific Performance and Declaratory Relief Concerning Lease Renewal Under Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 and Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to specific performance enforcing perpetual lease renewals
- 2 Whether the original lease was procured in breach of the trustee's duties and thus unenforceable or incapable of equitable enforcement
- 3 Whether plaintiffs were in breach of the lease at renewal and whether that precludes relief
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' summary judgment application was dismissed because it is arguable the lease was granted in breach of the trustee's duties by a grossly inadequate and capped rent that could operate in perpetuity, the adequacy of consideration paid is not established, and there are significant factual issues (including knowledge and dealings between the parties and solicitors' involvement) requiring trial rather than summary disposal.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' application for summary judgment dismissed.
Orders
- Costs reserved; parties may file memoranda on costs within 14 days with 7 days for any reply
- Registrar to allocate a first case management telephone conference on the first available date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment