EIGHT MILE STYLE, LLC v THE NZ NATIONAL PARTY & OR [2016] NZHC 741
Application for a split trial was dismissed. The defendants bore the onus and although liability and quantum are separable, three factors tipped the discretion against a split trial: (1) the plaintiffs' claim for additional damages under s121(2) reduced the prospects of settlement on quantum, (2) the pleaded defence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 741
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: EIGHT MILE STYLE, LLC; Second Plaintiff: MARTIN AFFILIATED, LLC; First Defendant: THE NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL PARTY; Second Defendant: ANOTHER; First Third Party: STAN 3 LIMITED; Second Third Party: SALE STREET STUDIOS LIMITED; Third Third Party: AMCOS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED; Fourth Third Party: AUSTRALASIAN MECHANICAL COPYRIGHT OWNERS SOCIETY LIMITED; Fifth Third Party: BEATBOX MUSIC PTY LIMITED; Fourth Party: LABRADOR ENTERTAINMENT INC; Fifth Party: MICHAEL ALAN COHEN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Copyright Infringement / Interlocutory Application for Split Trial on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Defendants' application for a split trial dismissed; costs awarded to defendants at 50% of a 2B award; no costs to plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Split Trial, Damages, Additional Damages, Innocent Infringement, Inquiry as to Damages, Account of Profits, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EIGHT MILE STYLE, LLC
First Plaintiff
MARTIN AFFILIATED, LLC
Second Plaintiff
THE NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL PARTY
First Defendant
ANOTHER
Second Defendant
STAN 3 LIMITED
First Third Party
SALE STREET STUDIOS LIMITED
Second Third Party
AMCOS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Third Third Party
AUSTRALASIAN MECHANICAL COPYRIGHT OWNERS SOCIETY LIMITED
Fourth Third Party
BEATBOX MUSIC PTY LIMITED
Fifth Third Party
LABRADOR ENTERTAINMENT INC
Fourth Party
MICHAEL ALAN COHEN
Fifth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Copyright Infringement / Interlocutory Application for Split Trial on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order a split trial separating liability and quantum
- 2 Whether an inquiry as to damages can be conducted contemporaneously with a liability trial
- 3 Whether amendment to pleadings (deleting inquiry and claiming damages) alters the appropriateness of a split trial
Ratio Decidendi
Application for a split trial was dismissed. The defendants bore the onus and although liability and quantum are separable, three factors tipped the discretion against a split trial: (1) the plaintiffs' claim for additional damages under s121(2) reduced the prospects of settlement on quantum, (2) the pleaded defence of innocent infringement under s121(1) meant quantum could not be reasonably deferred without undermining resolution, and (3) the multiplicity of third and fourth/fifth party downstream claims made separate hearings inefficient. The Court therefore refused the defendants' application and declined to award costs to the plaintiffs but awarded defendants 50% of a 2B costs award.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application for a split trial dismissed; costs awarded to defendants at 50% of a 2B award; no costs to plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendants' application for a split trial on liability and quantum is dismissed
- No costs are awarded to the plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment